• PORTFOLIOS
  • Prints
  • Licensing
  • Books
  • About
  • CONTACT
  • Blog
  • Instagram
  • LINKS
  • TECH INFO
Menu

William Karl Valentine

  • PORTFOLIOS
  • Prints
  • Licensing
  • Books
  • About
  • CONTACT
  • Blog
  • Instagram
  • LINKS
  • TECH INFO

Photographing the Doo Dah Parade in Pasadena with Frank on 11-24-24

Frank Schlegel (who lost his home) and other photographers of the Eaton Fire

March 5, 2025

I have known Frank Schlegel for well over forty years and first met him when he was working for Mike O’Brien who owned Flag’s Photo in Pasadena. When Flag’s closed Frank went to work for Samys Camera and he has been one of my best photography equipment contacts throughout my entire career. Frank and I have photographed together, most recently the last Doo Dah Parade in Pasadena, and he did my portrait for the dust cover of my Santa Anita book. Pasadena has a wonderful history of photography. The Huntington Library has an amazing photography collection, Pasadena City College and the Art Center of Design have good photography programs and going back to Adam Clark Vroman there have been some decent photographers who have called Pasadena home. Pasadena is one of those places if you grew up there you are always connected to the city whether or not you still live there or you move away. Frank has been a fixture in the Pasadena photo community for as long as I can remember. On January 7th, Frank lost his apartment, and most of his belongings, in the Eaton Fire. His apartment was four and a half blocks away from my mom’s house/

A number of Frank’s friends have stepped up to help him and I have tried to make myself available whenever he wanted to talk. The first couple conversations he really was dealing with the loss, there obviously was some shock still, but he was positive when it came to the task of moving forward. Shortly after the fire had swept through his neighborhood Frank started to photograph the devastation and his images were good, some of his best. I think Frank’s unique perspective was the reason. We talked about his photographs, and it was amazing how Frank was able to use his camera in healing process.

I think many of Frank’s Eaton Fire images are different from of my photographs in that he has really been locating and documenting incredible small details within the devastation. His photographic style or interest often was that way, for instance he loves photographing plant details at the Huntington Library, but the fire damage images are deeper because of his experience. I know my photographs from the Eaton Fire are different, my approach is different, I am photographing in a more methodical approach, almost forensic at times, spending more time in places. Every time I am up there photographing still has an intensity and with some emotional drain. I might be biased but there just seems to be a slight difference with photographs by local photographers who knew the area and ones who have come in from the outside. I know Pulitzer Prize winning photographer Nick Ut lives in Orange County and did an amazing job going from the Palisades Fire to the Eaton Fire in the first 24 hours. Nick is incredible with how much he is able to photograph, especially considering he is retired. Nick did a good job documenting a lot of different things in Altadena, especially the firefight, but he’s a press photographer it’s a different approach. I know Ken Light came down from the Bay Area and photographed both the Palisades and Altadena, but I have only seen a couple photographs from both locations, so I don’t know what his portfolio looks like. He is a good documentary photographer so I am interested to see what he photographed. Anther photographer that has stood out to me with the Eaton Fire is retired Pasadena Star News Photographer Walt Mancini, who was an outstanding local press photographer. I don’t think Walt was out photographing during the height of the fires, which was smart, but he was out the next day and has documented so many important things. The key to his images is he knows that area better than anyone else, and it shows in his images. As a kid and young photographer, I took note of Walt’s photographs in the paper all the time, and I know his images had an impact on my development as a photographer.

I have been trying to get Frank to write something for this blog post, but I know he has been too busy out photographing whenever he wasn’t working so I am still waiting on that. I even stopped by and saw him at Samy’s yesterday and checked in on him, he is doing good. When I get some writings, I will update this post with his words. While I was waiting for my camera sensors to be cleaned, I also talked with Jason Lyman, who manages the Pasadena Samys. Jason shared some interesting insight; he said sales were noticeably higher since the Eaton Fire. He said many customers were affected by the fires and he thought many of them were photographing the aftermath as part of the healing process. Below are screen grabs of some of Frank’s recent images as well as some of the other photographers Eaton Fire images.

UPDATE INFORMATION - On March 13th The Pasadena Weekly wrote an article about the Keychain Project and interviewed Frank. The Eaton Canyon Keychain Project is an art project where they collect keys to create works to memorial the loss of the Eaton Fire. Please check out the link.

Frank Schlegel’s Eaton Fire Portfolio:

View fullsize Frank's Apartment
View fullsize IMG_3998.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4066.jpg
View fullsize IMG_2404.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4394.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4393.jpg
View fullsize Day Care across the street from his apartment
View fullsize IMG_2405.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4374.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4392.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4372.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4366.jpg
View fullsize IMG_2403.PNG
View fullsize IMG_3506 (1).jpg
View fullsize IMG_4383.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4387.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4390.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4381.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4368.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4375.jpg
View fullsize Screenshot 2025-02-16 at 11.21.38 PM.jpeg
View fullsize IMG_4371.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4388.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4389.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4382.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4384.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4370.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4378.jpg
View fullsize IMG_2406.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4385.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4377.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4373.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4369.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4380.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4379.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4367.jpg
View fullsize IMG_4041.jpg
View fullsize IMG_2409.jpg
View fullsize IMG_2407.jpg

Some of Nick Ut’s photographs are below. I am still amazed that he photographed in the Palisades and was able to make it to the Altadena while the Eaton Fire was still burning. He does am amazing job going to the hard areas to photograph and I have come to really like his selfies to prove he was there.

View fullsize IMG_3539 (2).jpg
View fullsize IMG_3546 (2).jpg
View fullsize IMG_3541 (2).jpg
View fullsize IMG_3533 (1).jpg
View fullsize IMG_3542 (2).jpg
View fullsize IMG_3544 (2).jpg
View fullsize IMG_3538 (2).jpg
View fullsize IMG_3536 (1).jpg
View fullsize IMG_3537 (2).jpg

Kyle Grillot - Photographer

Kyle Grillot is a press photographer who captured one of the most iconic images from the Eaton Fire when he photographed Pasadena PD Officer Banuelos carrying a man to safety in Altadena (See Below), I believe on the morning of 1/8/25. I was not aware of Kyle’s work before seeing this image. He is a graduate of THE Ohio State University, and he has been photographing professionally for fifteen years. He absolutely is willing to go into the danger zone, his fire photographs, when he is in the middle of ember cast or raging flames are incredible. Among others, he photographs for the New York Times. I encourage you to follow him and check out his website. On his website check out the image of a Joshua Tree during the Bob Cat Fire, it is amazing. He was on Instagram @kylegrillot but minutes ago he made a post about Meta and said he was moving to Bluesky’s Flashes so hopefully you can track down his images.

Wally Skalij - Photographer

One last mention, I know Wally Skalij was out in the Palisades Fire, I am not sure if he made it to the Eaton Fire. Wally just announced his retirement from the staff of the Los Angelses Times yesterday. Wally was arguably the best Press Photographer of his era. He is a good documentary photographer, and I look forward to the portfolios he works on going forward now that he can be selective in his topics. He is another photographer who captured amazing images when he ran into the flames.

In Photography Tags Eaton Canyon, Eaton Fire, Frank Schlegel, Souther California Wildfires, Photography, Photographer, Wally Skalij, Kyle Grillot, Altadena, Altadena Strong, Samys camera
1 Comment

Don Norgood’s Photograph of Pasadena PD Motor Officer Tom Young on Green Street East of Orange Grove.

Appeared in Life Magazine on July 19th, 1969 - Originally published in the Pasadena Star News

LOWDOWN / SHOWDOWN Ed Norgood’s Photo of Pasadena PD Motor Officer Tom Young

January 19, 2025

Last November I was really focused on my hometown of Pasadena. I am up there a couple times a week to see my mom and check on things as it is but in November, I photographed the Doo Dah Parade again for the first time in a while and then the Pasadena Polic Department Alumni group on Facebook shared the above photograph which I remember really well from my childhood. I decided to research the image and write blog post about it. I at first thought long time Pasadena Star News Photographer Walt Mancini captured the image but after figuring out which issue of Life it appeared in, and actually purchasing a copy of it, I learned it was Ed Norgood’s photograph. Ed was another well-known Pasadena press photographer. I started writing this a month ago then all hell broke loose so I am just know trying to get caught up. As photographers I think there is value in looking at other photographer’s work. Most often that is involves examining images to understand the medium better, but in this case, I think seeing the life path that photography gave to Ed is also a valuable lesson.

Pasadena has been home to a number of good photographers, especially a number of good Press Photographers like John Lloyd, Walt Mancini, and Ed Norgood who captured the image above. For a press photographer I think Pasadena was ideal at the end of the last century because the Star News, the local paper, had great circulation, there were plenty of unique events to cover in Pasadena with the Rose Parade, Rose Bowl game, Super Bowls. Other prominent places like The Huntington Library, JPL, and Cal Tech are in Pasadena plus they got to cover events in Los Angeles because it was so close. It was the best of all worlds for a press photographer because you often had small town pace but then big-time action (and back then a paycheck). The pace allowed Ed Norgood the opportunity to see this image, photograph it, and get it published - eventually having it published in Life Magazine.

There have been other photographers come out of Pasadena like Adam Clark Vroman and myself (sorry I couldn’t resist) plus Pasadena City College had an outstanding photography program when I was there with people like Walt Girdner, “Uncle Walt”, who taught me my first photography class. I was lucky to be born and raised in the area.

The General

Often with a great image we lose sight of the people in them or at least their own story beyond the one image. Tom Young was a legendary officer at Pasadena, not only because he was a beast of a man but just because how well he controlled situations on the street. His nickname was the General and everyone loved working with him. The number of great comments about him on the Facebook post were amazing to read. I remember my dad showing me the photograph when I was a little kid and being proud that his friend, and someone from Pasadena PD, had been featured in Lide Magazine.

Interview by: Scott Swanson

Below is an interesting interview I found of Ed from the really small-town paper where he retired. I think it is an outstanding piece and gives insight in to why photographers photograph. The link is below, and I also copied and pasted the whole story because it had problems loading for me a couple of times.

The New Era - November 28, 2007

Edwin Norgord didn’t grow up intending to be a news photographer.

He actually intended to be an agricultural inspector in the citrus orchards of Southern California in the early 1950s.

But when that didn’t work out for him, he decided to take a photography class and ended up working for a Pasadena newspaper for 35 years, during which he shot movie stars, presidents, sports heroes and a lot of everyday human-interest photos, which were some of his favorites.

“The reason I love newspaper photography is because I dealt with people in all walks of life – the good, the ugly, the rich, the poor,” said Norgord, who will be 78 next month. “I’ve seen football players cry – just the emotion of people, trying to capture it on film.”

He did it well enough that he was recognized by his colleagues as the California Press Photographer of the Year in 1970.

Norgord was born and raised in Pasadena, Calif., about 10 miles northeast of Los Angeles, one of a family of seven children. He attended Marshall High School and John Muir Junior College during World War II before joining the Air Force in 1948 and serving in Japan during the Korean War.

After he was discharged in 1949, he enrolled in the Voorhis Unit of the California Polytechnic School in San Dimas, about 20 miles east of Pasadena. The college was all-male, so he and his buddies would cruise to other, all-female, campuses for social interaction.

“We had to go to the girls college in LaVerne (a few miles to the east) if we wanted to gallivant,” Norgord recalled. “When I got discharged, I bought a brand new car, a 1950 Chevy, and all the other college boys wanted to ride around in my car because it had skirts and pipes. That was my downfall because we were driving around to different girls schools and I wasn’t keeping up on my studies.”

Norgord said he also discovered that majoring in agriculture wasn’t for him.

“I couldn’t dissect leaves very well,” he said.

Transferring to Pasadena City College, he took a photography course and started chumming around with a friend, Elton Sewell, who was a photographer for the Pasadena Independent, a local tabloid newspaper.

“He got me started, really,” Norgord said. “He lent me a camera to use. I started to take pictures for the Independent – human interest, weather, accident photos.”

The editors liked his stuff and when an opening came up, they hired him to work weekends as a part-timer. He started working for the Independent full-time in 1954.

He said he particularly enjoyed working for Fred Runyon, the editor.

“He was the nicest guy you’d want to meet,” Norgord said. “A super, wonderful guy.

“One time when I was in the darkroom, I had taken a picture of my father-in-law taking a sliver out of his granddaughter’s hand. I walked into the house and saw him about ready to take the sliver out.

“I said ‘Hold it!’ and I ran out and got my Speedgraphic camera. They were under a desk lamp, so I took the bulb out and plugged a flashbulb into the lamp using this converter I had. Then I told them to go ahead and take sliver out. By the time I put the (film) slide back in, and got another negative in, he had the sliver out and the moment was past.

“I was in the darkroom printing this up, when my editor walked in and saw the print. I thought he was going to raise hell because I was doing this on company time. He said, ‘I’m going to fire you, Eddie, if you don’t enter this in a national contest.’ I did and got second place.

“He let reporters do whatever they wanted as long as they got job done.”

Norgord said he really enjoyed working with the reporters at the Independent, whom he said were “wonderful people.”

There was a lot of camaraderie and cooperation between public officials and the press, he said.

“In those days, if we all hung out in the press room at the police department, if there was a fire alarm, all of us photographers – from the L.A. Times, the Examiner, the Independent, the Herald Express, would jump in one car and follow the police car through red lights. They really worked with us in those days.

“Firefighters would urge us to go up the ladder to shoot a picture from the roof. They were very, very cooperative then.

“When one of the photographers was drunk, we’d shoot a holder for them.”

The job was enjoyable because it had challenge and he enjoyed working with people.

The whole idea of taking pictures is to try to illustrate a story, Norgord said, noting that the ability to spot situations with photo potential is key. One time, he said, he was supposed to shoot a photo to illustrate the start of spring.

“I went out and found a flower growing out of a spring sticking out of the ground in a vacant lot. You’re looking for things like that. It feels so great to go in and put a print like that on (the editor’s) desk.”

Norgord said he shot “lots of movie stars” including Bob Hope, Frank Sinatra and Gene Autry. He visited stars’ homes in Pasadena as well.

He also shot several presidents, but he particularly remembers one, Richard Nixon.

“I was really impressed by his brilliance, his speaking ability,” Norgord said. “He had an incredible memory. But I was jinxed by him.”

The first time he shot Nixon was at a hotel in Arcadia, near Pasadena. The president walked by, entering the hotel, and as Norgord was taking a photo, his Speedgraphic flash fell off and landed on Nixon’s foot.

Then, a few years later, he was at Nixon’s alma mater, Whittier College, about 15 miles south of Pasadena. Air had gotten into one of his flashbulbs, but as he reached into his bag to grab a bulb. he didn’t notice that the indicator dot on the bulb had turned pink, an indicator that the bulb was defective.

“I took a photo of him and Pat on the football field as he was giving a talk and my flash exploded and made a loud noise, flame shot out, and it sent glass all over him and Pat,” Norgord said. “I was so embarrassed by that. If it had been today, I would have been shot before I could explain.”

The last time Norgord photographed Nixon was at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. He and reporter Lou Spear went to Nixon’s room and after they were searched by a Secret Service agent, they entered the room where Nixon was sitting in a swivel chair.

“He swiveled around and looked at me and pointed his finger at me. ‘I know you, I know you,’ he said.

“I said, ‘Sir, do you want me to leave?’

“He said, ‘No, come on in.’

Norgord wanted to shoot the photo with available light but he had to avoid shooting a profile of Nixon’s nose, by the president’s request.

“He is one president who uses hand language. He speaks with his hands,” Norgord said. “I got some tremendous shots of him. When I went back, they were on deadline. They ran a one-column mug with no hands or anything. That upset me a little bit.”

One of his more exciting experiences was during a forest fire that he covered soon after starting with the Independent. He drove into the mountains north of Pasadena and found a camp full of firefighters who were sleeping after working on the fire line.

“I was taking pictures when the fire captain told me I had to leave because they were evacuating because the fire was coming toward them,” Norgord said.

As he left, he made a wrong turn on the dirt road and drove for miles on a road that was too narrow to turn the car around. Suddenly, embers started raining down on him and the car began overheating because the air temperature was about 115 degrees due to the advancing flames. Norgord was also almost out of gas.

Finally, he came upon a highway patrolman who was blocking the road.

“He said, ‘I thought the road was burned out back there,'” Norgord recalled. “I couldn’t talk because my throat was so dry.”

The police officer let him through and he made it to a nearby ranger station where he was able to beg a couple of gallons of gas. He also got a ride on a water tender to the fire.

“I ended up getting some of best fire photos of my career there,” he said. “They ran in our paper and in a magazine called ‘Stag.'”

The assignments he “dreaded” were “high-society” shots.

But, he said, even they sometimes turned out to be less than onerous.

“The people who had the money didn’t have to prove it,” Norgord said, relating a story of the time he was on an assignment in which he and a “society lady” drove up a long, brick driveway.

When they got to the mansion at the top, the woman went into the house and Norgord started talking with a man who was pruning roses nearby.

“When we left, the lady said, ‘Ed, do you know who that was?'”

Norgord said he assumed it was a gardener. Turns out, he said, it was the vice-president of Standard Oil.

Sometimes, he said, news photos didn’t come easily even when they were easy to get to.

That happened on June 6, 1968 after Robert F. Kennedy was shot by Sirhan Sirhan in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel. Sirhan’s mother worked at a local Roman Catholic church and Norgord went to try to get a photo of her.

“I went to the church where his mother worked and the priest asked me what I was doing there,” he remembered. “I said, ‘I’d like to take a picture of Mrs. Sirhan Sirhan if you haven’t told her yet.’

“He said, ‘We haven’t told her yet but we don’t want you to take a picture when she finds out. ‘

“I said, ‘I respect your wishes, but this is not local news, this isn’t even national news. This is an international story. I’d like to record this for history.’

“The priest said, ‘You know, you’re right.’ He said he’d let me take one picture when they told her.

“Sometimes you have to talk your way into news photos.”

Norgord worked at the Independent until the Knight-Ridder company bought the newspaper in 1988 and merged it with the Star-News. He was 58 and he decided to retire.

He and his wife moved to Mono Village, a resort outside Bridgeport in the eastern Sierras. He worked at the boat dock and in the grocery store and stopped taking photos for a while, he said.

“I loved my work while I was at the newspaper, but I had to get out,” he said, adding that his departure was hastened by a change in management.

After a divorce from his first wife, Norgord married a “long-time acquaintance” and they moved to Sweet Home in 1992.

“I loved the country, the outdoors and I wanted to get away from the big city,” he said.

His wife, Sherry, works for the Linn-Co Credit Union.

“She’s quite a bit younger than I,” Norgord said. “That’s what keeps me young.”

Now that he’s retired, he still has an interest in photography. He’s been drafted as the official photographer at the Evangelical Church and he’s still a member of the Los Angeles Press Photographer’s Association, so he enjoys seeing the work of photographers he knows who are still in the business.

The technology has changed drastically since he stopped taking news photos – news photographers have switched to digital and the darkrooms at most newspapers are obsolete.

“I have a digital camera now,” he said. “I’m still learning about it. Today I’m so blessed to have a self-focused, automatic camera now because my eyes are bad.

“Photography has gone a long way – It’s a lot easier to cope with than back in my day, especially with a Speedgraphic.

Photography was fun, mainly because of the people he worked with, he said.

“To me, it was a God-given great job that I had,” Norgord said. “I worked with wonderful people. Most people don’t have a job that they enjoy that much. I got an awful lot of prestige in my job. It was quite a reward to open up the paper and see your work in it. “

Photographer Ed Norgood (featured photograph for this blog post is visible behind him.

View fullsize Web1 CA DSC_6215_ 11292024  _1.jpg
View fullsize Web1 CA DSC_6217_ 11292024  .jpg

Technology today is in many ways wonderous. First I was able to be reminded about this image I remember from my childhood by a Facebook post on the Pasadena PD’s alumni group’s page that I am a member of. From there I was able to research the Life issue more, find multiple vendors across America selling copies, and I was able to order one in very good condition to add to my photography collection. Finally, from there I was able to search the web for more information the photographer Ed Norgood. I found a needle in the haystack by locating the above article from 17 years ago (almost to the day) by a small-town paper in Oregon where Ed had retired. Those are all the cool things. But the pace of today’s world has pretty much killed, or permanently changed, all the big print media like picture magazines and major newspapers. I grew up with the Pasadena Star News, it somehow still survives but it is a shell of what it once was. Multiple small papers have been condensed into it, so it covers a massive era in less depth and the staff is a fraction of what it once was. I touched on this with my Doo Dah Parade blog post that will follow this post. Old magazines and newspapers are amazing documents well beyond the individual story you are referencing back to today. these publications allow us to have a more complete picture of the moments in time they documented and that is something we are losing now with or instant gratification look and swipe world of digesting information. Another thing we are losing is in this era you knew your news source and over time you could develop a trust of, or a distrust, of your source because it was mostly consistent. Today we see so much information from so many different sources many of which we have no idea how reliable they are. It is truly a double edge sword that I fear will do more damage than good over time unless there are fresh ideas on how to improve how we vet today’s sources. This is going to get especially had soon because of all the AI content that is and will be generated in the coming days.

Below are six images from the same Life issue that I found interesting. 55 years ago they were reporting on Presidents and global warming which we are still talking about but look at the products being advertised! The country was aware of women’s rights but related it to cigarettes which now have limited advertising and less users. Every cellphone now produces better video quality that Kodak’s movie camera. Then finally we are now moving to electric and hybrid vehicles instead of this gas hog Continental Mark III (which is amazingly gorgeous beast).

View fullsize Web1 CA DSC_6229_ 11292024  .jpg
View fullsize Web1 CA DSC_6227_ 11292024  .jpg
View fullsize Web1 CA DSC_6219_ 11292024  .jpg
View fullsize Web1 CA DSC_6223_ 11292024  .jpg
View fullsize Web1 CA DSC_6225_ 11292024  .jpg
View fullsize Web1 CA DSC_6231_ 11292024  .jpg
In Photographer Tags Ed Norgood, Pasadena Star News, Pasadena Police Department, Life, Life Magazine, Scott Swanson, The New Era, Photography, Press Photography, Photographer, Walt Mancini, Walt Girdner
Comment

George A. Tice - Photographer October 13, 1938 – January 16, 2025

January 19, 2025

I have a limited number of other photographer’s work in my collection, something I should probably be better about. One print I do have is the above George Tice print Ferry Slip, Jersey City, NJ 1979. I purchased it over 25 years ago, can’t remember the cost, it was reasonable because he produced large editions, but I added it because I loved the composition and tonality of the print plus I also like New York City a lot. The number one rule in buying any work of art is you have to enjoy it, its never solely about investing.

Sadly, George A. Tice passed away on January 16th at 86 and I just heard about it.

George A. Tice - Country Road Landcaster PA 1961 - One of his most well-known images.

Gallery Gadcollection has an excellent webpage dedicated to Tice including an embedded video interview of him from 2019 where interestingly the last of six questions they aske him is about when he meets God. The page details most of Tice’s highlights and nice because it is so clear and concise. I also loved the fact that Tice chose a print of Ferry Slip to be in the video right behind him which suggests that is one of his favorite images too. There is also an interesting image on this page that Tice captured in 1959 of an explosion on the USS Wasp while he was in the Navy. He was no more than 21 years old at the time and I find this image incredible because it immediately reminded me of the Steerage by Stieglitz.

Tice’s work is in numerous permanent collections and for me it is sad every time our medium loses another icon. I am thankful for the work he left us with.

In Photographer Tags George A. Tice, Documentary Photography, Photography, Photographer, obituary
Comment

"Photoganda" - the attempt to censor Evan Vucci's iconic photograph

July 19, 2024

I saw the term “Photoganda” for the first time yesterday and when I heard what it was referring to, I felt compelled to write about it here on my blog.  “Photoganda” is related to an apparent upswing of support Donald Trump has gained after Saturday’s failed assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. It specifically identifies the powerful images from the event by photographers Evan Vucci and Doug Mills as the reason for the upswing.  From what I can find Axios used the term “Photoganda” three days ago when they wrote an article about the photographers who documented the incident (It is a short but good read). Axios reported that unidentified photo editor(s) were calling for media outlets to stop sharing the images of a defiant and wounded Trump because they felt the images are giving Trump an unfair advantage in the Presidential campaign right now. From there other new outlets starting using the term. The term is very attention getting but problematic in concept. If there are certain individuals trying to devalue the importance of the photographs from the assassination attempt for the benefit of their own political interests, and they actually coined the term “Photoganda” then I have a serious problem with them. It is a dangerous term especially as we are entering an era of more AI imagery where people may already be starting to question the authenticity of documentary images.

When I heard of the assassination attempt, I immediately turned on the TV and most channels were showing the same 3 minutes of tape just before the shooting until Trump was driven off.  Being a photographer with several decades of law enforcement experience I focused on lots of different details in the video.  First the security tactics and response but then I noticed the two photographers who moved forward immediately after the volley of shots to document the incident.  Early on I thought about authoring a post about the photographers based on their movement during the event and when I saw the images they captured I wanted to showcase them as photographers because it was obvious that these images would become iconic and most likely Pulitzer worthy.  Those photographers received immediate media recognition so the need for post became less of an issue. Then the “Photoganda” dialogue yesterday motivated me to pick up the pace to author this post.

I’ll address the newly created term “Photoganda” first.  It obviously refers to Propaganda which is defined as: Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.  Everyone agrees that Evan Vucci’s photograph of Trump with blood running down his cheek, raising his fist, with the flag in the background is factually correct; There are no claims of AI elements or manipulation. Most people also realize the image is a huge gift to the Trump campaign.  The image instantly became iconic and no matter what your political beliefs are I think everyone can agree that Vucci and the other photographer were in the right place, at the right time to document something historical, but none of the photographers in Pennsylvania crafted images with the intent of creating propaganda.  Even if they wanted to, they didn’t have time; they couldn’t prepare their shot (excuse the term) because none of them knew what they were about to witness, and they had limitations on their positions where they could photograph from, plus they all captured the same events just from different vantage points.  If you look back to World War II there are plenty of great examples of Propaganda, the evil Nazi Joseph Goebbels was a master propagandist who comprehended the power of images, especially newsreels, to manipulate public opinion. US General Douglas MacArthur was aware of the power images had too, producing news reels of him returning to the Philippines and preferring photographers to photograph him from a low vantage point to visually increase his stature.  We can also examine Joe Rosenthal’s photograph of the flag raising on Mount Suribachi on Iwo Jima, which at different points in history has been accused of being carefully crafted, or possibly staged. Rosenthal earned a Pulitzer for the image which has become an unofficial second logo of the United States Marine Corps and is recognized worldwide still to this day.  I heard TV commentator Jesse Watters have a humorous take on the “Photoganda” issue when he said “They take the photographs, we disseminate them, the public consumes it. If you don’t want to be part of the process, make pottery and sell it by the side of the road”. The images we are seeing in the media of the attempted assassination of Trump are just outstanding press or photojournalistic photographs. Sure, they could eventually be used in a propaganda form, most likely an unlicensed item, but as they are being shared now, they are not propaganda.

Donal Trump after failed assassination attempt. Photograph by Evan Vucci - AP Chief Photographer in Washington DC

Evan Vucci is AP’s Chief Photographer in Washington DC, and he captured the above image of a bloodied Trump the flag in the background (In the video of the incident I believe Evan is wearing a plaid shirt and a baseball hat).  I assume he will win another Pulitzer for this image.  New York Times Photographer Doug Mills, who was wearing a grey sun hat in the videos is another Pulitzer Prize winning photographer that captured some incredible images including the one below.  Both these two photographers were moving about immediately after the shooting positioning themselves to get their images.  Doug was directly below Trump photographing when the Bullet struck Trump’s ear.  Doug told CBS News he made a burst exposure with his Sony camera and that one of the frames captured the bullet.  He mentioned his camera was capable of 30 frames per second, so I assume the camera body was an Alpha 1, unfortunately he didn’t state what his shutter speed was for the exposure.  I would expect his shutter speed was over 1/800th of a second so if the bullet was travelling around 2000 feet per second at that point the length of the line in his image would be consistent with how far the bullet traveled while the exposure was being made.  It is an incredible capture one that Harold Edgerton would be jealous of.  Doug said an FBI Forensic Specialist inspected the RAW image file and confirmed it documented the bullet in flight immediately after it had struck Trump.  In watching the CBS interview of Doug Mills he spoke about former New York Times Photographer Ron Edmonds who photographed the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan in 1981.  Doug said they worked together for 15 years and that he had talked with Ron several times about photographing the Reagan event.  Ron told Doug in situations like that “to go forward don’t go backwards” to get the best images.  Ron was also a Pulitzer Prize winning photographer and he unfortunately passed away last month.

Donald Trump as gunshots are fired at his campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, 2024. This photo appears to show a bullet in the air near Trump. DOUG MILLS/THE NEW YORK TIMES

As I talked about above the motivation for this post was the creation of the term “Photoganda” and the suggestion that some people with political agendas were trying to censor outstanding press images solely because those photographs were not beneficial to their political goals.  Censorship is a violation of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution, and it angers me when anyone tries preventing someone else from expressing themselves, in this case especially since these photographers were just sharing factually correct images of an historic event.  Another thing I want to mention is I hope Evan and Doug are somehow able to receive some compensation from all the people who I know are all marketing their images in a variety of products.  Copyright is also an important thing, unfortunately with so many people using Evan’s image already it will be a big task to track down every one of them.  I know both photographers were on a paid assignment but hopefully they can monetize their images beyond their salary that day because I am sure their images are generating thousands of dollars for others. I also want to share Evan’s quote after capturing such an iconic image: “I haven't had a chance to really think about any of that stuff. But apparently, the photo is pretty viral.”

Anna Moneymaker’s photograph Donald Trump after he was shot.

There were other photographers at the rally as well. Anna Moneymaker from Getty captured the incredible photograph of Trump on the ground after being shot through the legs of a Secret Service Agent who is shielding him. In an incident with an adrenaline spike like this, I suspect many photographers would have missed that image; their cameras probably would have focused on the agent’s rear end not Trump. She captured a hard image, in a dangerous environment. Gene J. Puskar who is a Pittsburgh based AP photographer also captured some solid images. Unfortunately for all the photographers who captured great images out that day, the world is most likely only remember the big three images by Vucci, Mills, and Moneymaker images.

We live in a world of reels and video content now, and a biproduct of that I think is often a short attention span for content.  We have so much video and still image content from this event, but I love the fact people are focused on the still image.  The still image allows the viewer to exam and reflect at our own pace and we need to be reminded of that fact.  The capability of today’s cameras to capture detail is incredible.  We have never been able to dissect an historic event like this with so many highly detailed images of the event.  When I saw the photographs of Trump after he was shot there was no question to the location and extent of his injury, I am still in awe of the detail in the images.

I mentioned above how Ron Edmonds had told Doug Mills to go forward in critical incidents and it reminded me of some of the best advice I ever received studying at Arizona State University. When one of my professors, Bill Jenkins, saw the first few rolls of my Pasadena PD series he gave me similar advice when he suggested I change from a 50mm lens to a wide-angle lens to force myself to get closer to my subject matter. The suggestion was outstanding, and I have used it with most of photographs since. There is an edge you get being in close that takes most photographs to another level. Tactically, from a law enforcement perspective, I was taught early on that often the best way to handle a threat if you are out in the open is to go right at it instead of retreating. I worked with a number of Vietnam veterans in my career including a Green Beret and a Seal, both had incredible insight on how to survive. Obviously a completely different objective but an interesting parallel.

Finally, from a law enforcement perspective I saw some good things that officers and agents did and some bad things.  From the protection perspective it was inexcusable to allow the suspect to have gained access to the roof location, and then for the counter sniper team to allow the suspect to fire, especially multiple rounds.  After being shot Donald Trump should not have stopped to raise his fist in defiance because it exposed himself it there were multiple threats beside the first sniper.  Maybe Trump had gone in to shock by that point, if so it was a strong reaction on his part, but the security detail should have covered him and whisked him to the car.  Luckily for Evan that didn’t happen, and he captured the image he did.  I will leave it there because there are so many other people scrutinizing what happened there and my primary focus here is on photographs.  I am concerned that more press photographers will be able to document similarly chaotic events in the coming months, I hope they won’t have those opportunities, because I know we all need a break from the tension of the last eight years.

 Related Articles

AP - Images altered to make them look like Secret Service Agents were smiling after the assassination attempt.

Evan Vucci's Trump Image Is a Legendary American Photograph - The Atlantic

In pictures: Trump injured in shooting at Pennsylvania rally | CNN Politics

Time Magazine interview of Evan Vucci

In Civil Unrest, Photography, Photographer Tags Photoganda, Evan Vucci, Doug Mills, Ron Edmunds, Trump assassination attempt, Press Photography, Photojournalism, Photography, A, American History, Sony Alpha 1
Comment

CHI DSC 3029 3-22-24 “Untitled” (Wells & Wacher, Chicago)

Chicago Photograph brings back memories of 25 years ago

June 21, 2024

When I got back from Chicago in March and started going through all my images I came across this photograph above. At first glance I saw how the elements in the frame were interesting, and I understood how I was drawn to make the exposure. But when I zoomed in, I immediately realized that the little girl in the stroller looked so similar to my daughter Alyssa at that age and that reminded me how often we used to take her to Chicago for vacations. The little girl in the stroller is so alert to the world around her just like Alyssa was at that age. I am assuming it was seeing the stuffed animal in the girl’s arm that really made the connection. The girl is clutching it in such a protective way, you know how special the toy is for her. My daughter was exactly the same way, and that period of innocence was so wonderful. The image brought to mind how much a parent tries and protect their children when they are young and also how in today’s society I still worry about my adult children’s safety as crime and world tensions rise. Viewing this image became an incredibly intense experience rather quickly as I realized everything I just mentioned, and I was not expecting that. The experience motivated me to revisit my negatives and see what images I had of Alyssa when we would take her Chicago when she was young. Below is one of my Chicago photographs from 25 years ago when Alyssa two years old.

CHI-171 #29 5-03-99 - Alyssa Valentine at the Hancock Tower

I don’t know if there is too much more to say about these images or the recent experience. I don’t want to make it into something more than it is, but I thought there was value in sharing how I felt with people interested in my work or just interested a photographer’s process. I think it not only gives insight to the fact I am an admitted romantic, but it also highlights how a photograph can evoke strong emotions from the image maker even when that was not the original intent. I know everyone brings their own experiences with them when they view an image and that people often have different responses to images based on their own prior experiences. I also want to point out that images can become more important overtime and develop new layers of meaning particularly if public opinion of the subject matter changes or if the subject matter documents change in and of itself. Viewers opinions can also change over time as they have different experiences with the same image. These are all some of the reasons why I don’t delete image files or purge old negatives.

In Artist, Street Photography, Photographer, Photography Tags Looking at Photographs, Chicago, Street Photography, Power of Photography, Photography, Photographer, Daughters, Alyssa Valentine
Comment
View fullsize web NB DSC_1420_ 01122024 _2.jpg
View fullsize web web NB DSC_1446_ 01122024  .jpg

A Long Arc - Photography and the American South

May 26, 2024

When I was studying photography at Arizona State, I became aware of the FSA photographers, the photographers who documented the Civil Rights Movement, Matthew Brady, and William Christenberry.  The images these photographers captured impacted how I see today.  I remember installing Christenberry’s photographs for an exhibition at the Northlight Gallery in Matthews Hall on campus, and being in awe of how beautiful the prints were. Christenberry’s work probably was the most obvious in documenting the American South, he captured scenes that only exist there.  At that time in my life when I was looking at the work of other photographers working in the South I was focused more on the specific subject matter and the craftsmanship of the images.  Over time, from revisiting my own images, I have gained a better understanding of how many layers of meaning an image can actually have.  Some images may have an obvious singular message, but many images have multiple layers of meaning and information once you learn how to look at photographs.  I also remember Bill Jay stressing to us in class that every viewer brings their own experiences to each image and what is important to one viewer may not be important to another. 

One of the people I follow on social media is Gregory Harris who is the is the High Museum of Art’s Donald and Marilyn Keough Family Curator of Photography. I have had the opportunity to meet Greg and I greatly respect his knowledge of Contemporary and Documentary Photography. At the end of last year, I saw him announce the release of the catalogue / book titled A long Arc Southern Photography which accompanied the exhibition at the High Museum.  I was immediately interested in the book, so I contacted the High Museum gift shop to arrange a purchase.  The book is the subject of this blog post, a post that is woefully overdue.

Weighing in at over 4 lbs. this 304 page Aperture book with over 275 photographs was published last November to accompany the exhibition which opened at the High Museum and is now currently on display at The Addison Gallery of Art at the Phillips Academy in Andover, Massachusetts until July 31st. From there it moves to the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts for an exhibition opening October 5th, 2024. The book is a beast, but it must be to properly cover the subject matter otherwise they would have omitted important photographers.  I love the layout of the book and the content; it is an amazing documentation of the history of photography in the American South.  The printing is good, and I like the fact the image descriptions and titles accompany the images.  The dimensions of the book are unique, but it works well, allowing creativity with the image placement on the pages.  The amount of information in this book, written and actual images, is incredible.  The only complaint I have about the book is the font size and text padding are smaller than I prefer, it isn’t an easy read, but I understand why that is because it would probably add another twenty-five plus pages to an already big book.

This book really brought in to focus how important the American South has been to the history of photography.  As I stated above, early on in my career I was aware of many of the notable photographers who had photographed in the South, but I hadn’t given any thought to how much the region was actually documented.  When I started going through this book I was immediately impressed by how many great photographers had photographed in the South.  I also was surprised to learn that some images I knew well, but had not considered the location, had actually been photographed in the South; the cover image of Robert Frank’s The Americans book is an example of one of those images.

A Long Arc - Photography and the American South - Page Examples:

View fullsize web CA DSC_9211_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC_1423_ 01122024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9225_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9212_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC_1425_ 01122024 .jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC_1428_ 01122024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9215_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9214_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC_1439_ 01122024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9213_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC_1429_ 01122024 .jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC_1430_ 01122024 .jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC_1432_ 01122024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9217_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9223_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9219_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9224_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9218_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9226_ 05252024 .jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_9220_ 05252024 .jpg

 Much of America is changing today because of ideological influences, migration, and a host of other factors that are too complex to get in to here.  Many of our major cities have quality of life issues with things like the high cost of living, overcrowding, and criminal justice failures.  Having visited Atlanta a couple years ago I felt the region seemed less affected by the problems in other parts of the country.  I am not naïve to problems of the South’s past, but I didn’t feel the same racial tension in Atlanta that I have felt recently in Los Angeles (which has increased dramatically from when I was younger).  The small portion of the South I have seen seems to be more like the America of the 20th Century than a lot of other parts of the country are today and I appreciate that.  It is important to retain our American identity as a society while still appreciating and respecting the diversity within the whole.  I think the residents in the South may be doing a better job of this than other regions of our country.  So, with all this said, I think this book also has value documenting the community of the South which is separate from the history of photography element of the book.  Another thing to appreciate is how many images in the book also document important historic and transformative moments in American history.

I have reviewed several books here on my blog and with each the goal is to give a fair evaluation of the book along with my personal taste opinions.  One thing I always try to identify is who the book is best suited for, since photography interests and tastes are so varied and photography books can be expensive.   This is one of the few recent books that I believe would be a good addition to anyone’s photography library.  This book is as complete a document as you can author for the subject.  The reader will definitely learn something new about the medium and probably rediscover some images they had not thought about in a while.  The book is well worth the price, Amazon now has it for $47.  It is important for photographers to understand the history of the medium to be good at their craft.  I know most of us think New York is the center of the photographic universe but the photographs from the American South are some of the most important images ever made. 

 

The book’s official description is as follows:

Collects over 175 years of key moments in the visual history of the Southern United States, with over two hundred and fifty photographs taken from 1845 to present. The South is perhaps the most mythologized region in the United States and also one of the most depicted. Since the dawn of photography in the nineteenth century, photographers have articulated the distinct and evolving character of the South’s people, landscape, and culture and reckoned with its fraught history. Indeed, many of the urgent questions we face today about what defines the American experience—from racism, poverty, and the legacy of slavery to environmental disaster, immigration, and the changes wrought by a modern, global economy—appear as key themes in the photography of the South. The visual history of the South is inextricably intertwined with the history of photography and also the history of America, and is therefore an apt lens through which to examine American identity. A Long Arc: Photography and the American South accompanies a major exhibition at the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, with more than one hundred photographers represented, including Walker Evans, Robert Frank, Gordon Parks, William Eggleston, Sally Mann, Carrie Mae Weems, Dawoud Bey, Alec Soth, and An-My Lê. Insightful texts by Imani Perry, Sarah Kennel, Makeda Best, and Rahim Fortune, among others, illuminate this broad survey of photographs of the Southern United States as an essential American story. Copublished by Aperture and High Museum of Art, Atlanta

Details         

Format: Hardback

Number of pages: 304

Number of images: 275

Publication date: 2023-11-21

Measurements: 8.07 x 11.42 inches

ISBN: 9781597115513

Contributors

Imani Perry is the Hughes-Rogers Professor of African American Studies at Princeton University and a faculty associate with the programs in law and public affairs, gender and sexuality studies, and jazz studies.

Sarah Kennel is the Aaron Siskind Curator of Photography and Director of the Raysor Center for Works on Paper at Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, Richmond.

Gregory J. Harris is the Donald and Marilyn Keough Family Curator of Photography at the High Museum of Art.

Makeda Best is the Richard L. Menschel Curator of Photography at the Harvard Art Museums.

LeRonn P. Brooks is associate curator for modern and contemporary collections at the Getty Research Institute in Los Angeles.

Rahim Fortune is a photographer living and working between Austin and Brooklyn.

Grace Elizabeth Hale is commonwealth professor of American studies and history at the University of Virginia.

Maria L. Kelly is assistant curator of photography at the High Museum of Art.

Scott L. Matthews is assistant professor of history at Florida State College at Jacksonville.

Brian Piper is Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Assistant Curator of Photographs at the New Orleans Museum of Art.

Press Quotes:

“The magnificence of a retrospective like this is not just the accounting offered by its historical sweep, but the way it conveys the immense complexity of this region, to inspire a renewed attention to the cruel radiance of what is. Suffering does not always lead to compassion and change, but photographs like these remind us that standing in witness to suffering surely should.”—Margaret Renkl, The New York Times

“…these photographs demonstrate how essential the South has been not only to American history and identity, but to American photography—from Mathew Brady’s battlefield images of the Civil War (1861–65) to the intimate interiors of Carrie Mae Weems.”—Andrew Durbin, Frieze magazine

Additional Information about the Exhibition:

You Tube Video of the Installation at the High Museum (11 mins)

In Photography Books, Photography Collector, Photography Exhibitions, Museums, Photography, Civil Unrest Tags A Long Arc - Photography and the American South, Brian Piper, New Orleans Museum of Art, Scott L. Matthews, Maria L. Kelly, High Museum, Grace Elizabeth Hale, University of Virginia, Rahim Fortone, Gregory Harris, LeRonn P. Brooks, Getty Research Institute, Makeda Best, Harvard, Sarah Kennel, Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, Imani Perry, Princeton, Walker Evans, Gordon Parks, William Christenberry, William Eggleston, Dawoud Bey, Baldwin Lee, Aperture, Matthew Brady, Robert Frank, Garry Winogrand, FSA, Margaret Renkl, The New York Times, Andrew Durbin, The Addison Gallery, Phillips Academy, Arizona State University, Bill Jay, Photography, Photography Book
Comment

Winogrand Color & Friedlander's The People's Pictures

March 9, 2024

This blog post is a review of several new photography books I recently added to my library.

The release of Winogrand Color was my motivation to go book shopping online.   I have mentioned this time and again I love Winogrand’s photographs, and I am always interested books about his work.  While ordering the Winogrand book I also came across The People’s Pictures by Lee Friedlander and two other books which were on sale and looked interesting, so I added them to the cart as well.

 

Twin Palms publishers describes Winogrand Color as follows

Winogrand Color presents 150 photographs selected from the archives at the Center for Creative Photography by the American film director, Michael Almereyda and former Museum of Modern Art curator, Susan Kismaric. It is the first monograph dedicated to the artist's rarely seen color work.

Images were selected from the 45,000 color slides that Winogrand photographed in the 1950’s and 1960’s.

Published November 2023, 12” x 12”, 176 pages, 150 four color plates.

The retail price is $85. Twin Palms produced two slipcase editions of 50 which are already sold out at ($300 ea) and they produced a limited edition of 750 books with an alternative cover image ($85) which is still available.  The first edition printing is 7,000 books.

 

My first impression of Winogrand Color was good.  I like the page layouts; I think the image sizes and book size are appropriate and the design is clean and simple, which I really like.  The printing is very good, many images have deep shadow areas, and the printer was able to keep shadow details while still achieving solid blacks where appropriate.  In reading the book detail I saw it was printed in Turkey and that several people were involved in the image restoration process, this suggested the Winogrand’s transparencies may not have been properly processed or stored. 

As a document the book is good.  First it documents an era in color well that most of us remember primarily in black and white. Second, and most importantly, the book allows us to see more Winogrand photographs, most of these images we have not seen before, and that allows the viewer to gain deeper knowledge about one of the greatest documentary photographers of all time.  The photographs in this book also reaffirm that Winogrand was not wedded solely to Black and White photography.  I remember in the 2018 documentary film on him, “All things are Photographable”, where Winogrand spoke about photographing with color film but had reservations about it because, at the time, he could not produce archival prints of color images.  It showed the choice was at least partially a business decision not just an artistic one.  So, as a photographer myself, the photographs in this book gave me a lot of clues about how Garry Winogrand photographed.

Many of Winogrand’s most famous images were made with a 28mm lens on a Leica M4.  A number of the color images in the book seem to be made with longer legnth lenses.  Winogrand is at his best when there are layers of information in his image.  Winogrand was quoted numerous times talking about how he liked his photographs to be more interesting than the subject matter and how he photographed to see what something looked like photographed.  With a wide-angle lens, you tend to have more content in the frame which lends itself to what Winogrand was after.  You can still achieve images with deep meaning using longer focal lengths, Max Yavno is someone who photographed that way, but it did not seem to be Winogran’s typical approach.  Thinking of Winogrand’s Women are Beautiful, when I saw the entire portfolio displayed at Pier 24’s exhibition “The Grain of the Present” in 2017, I really became aware of how rarely he used a longer lens. 

This book begins with a number of longer focal length images at Coney Island I assume. They seemed more voyeuristic than insightful and I questioned if these were images that Winogrand really would have included in a portfolio or if he was just exploring with his camera.  Was the color film and the focal lengths a careful creative decision or was it more spontaneous. I don’t know how Garry set up his cameras related to film type or if he carried similar focal length lenses.  I have seen video of Winogrand photographing in the 1980’s and he had a single camera in hand and camera bag, but he didn’t seem to be transitioning to a second camera body.  I wonder if Winogrand had his primary Lieca M4 with the 28mm lens loaded with black and white film and then had a telephoto lens on another Leica loaded with color slide film?  Having photographed in the pre-digital era I remember having to carry two camera bodies if I wanted to photograph in color and black and white.  It would also make sense logistically if he had a telephoto lens on the camera with color film too, because if he wanted to use a telephoto lens for a black and white image, he could just trade the lenses between bodies.  (It is unfortunate that so many photographers today have never worked with analog cameras because it would give them a greater appreciation of what photographers in the past accomplished.)

Several images in the book looked to me as if Winogrand saw something that interested him, and he used the color film camera to just see the difference of how the image would be in color.  One example is his famous image of a couple in Central Park Zoo with the baby monkeys.  The famous black and white image is framed so much better than the color image in this book.  Interestingly when examining and comparing the color and the black and white imagers of the couple it is obvious the color image was photographed with a wide angel lens and that the black and white image may have been photographed with a slightly longer length lens but still not a telephoto lens. The black and white image is the better composed and the lack of color helps the viewer focus on the details within the frame. There are a few images in the book that seem just okay like he was making an exposure to see the difference but not with the intent to ever exhibit the image.  The photo in the book of a boxing match where you basically just see the ceiling looks like an absolute mistake, like it was an accidental exposure (Like most photographers I have captured many mistakes in my time).  There are a number of images in this book that seem to fall short.  This book is not an example of Winogrand’s best work, and I question the curator’s selections and wonder if Winogrand would have showcased the same images; I also can’t imagine if the editors had 45,000 color images that this collection was the best of that lot. I have not been able to find a concise statement about this book from either Tod Papageorge or Joel Meyerowitz who photographed with Winogrand during this time and know his process better than most people; I would love to hear their review of it. I think Arthur Lubow from the New York Times wrote a solid article reviewing the book and comparing Winogrand’s color work with other noted photographers working with color film at the time. The only thing in Lubow’s article I would question is when he said this about the couple in the Central Park Zoo: “It is a biting and unsettling comment on the era’s prevailing slurs about interracial marriage.”. I completely understand interpreting this image this way with today’s viewpoints, and I am sure some viewers now, and through the years, share Lubbow’’s opinion. But I specifically remember Tod Papageorge discussing this image in the documentary film on Winogrand “All Things Are Photographable” and dispelling that intent. Papageorge was there with Winogrand when he photographed the couple and in fact Papageorge photographed Winogrand with the couple. In 2014 Tod Papageorge wrote an article about the image for Transatlantica that explains everything about it. I have authored a separate blog with more detail on this subject.

So, to wrap up my opinion of the book, it does have value for me since I get to see more examples of Winogrand’s work and continue to better understand him. This book is not a priority add for a photography library and it isn’t something everyone should buy.  1964 and Figments from the Real World are much better books that showcase Winogrand at his best. This book is for people wanting to learn more about Winogrand and how he photographed.  I am happy I added it to my library, and I know other Winogrand fans will feel the same way.

View fullsize webNB DSC_2007_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize Attachment-1 (23).jpeg
View fullsize webNB DSC_2008_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize webNB DSC_2011_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize webNB DSC_2014_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize webNB DSC_2019_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize webNB DSC_2023_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize webNB DSC_2026_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize Attachment-1 (25).jpeg
View fullsize Attachment-1 (22).jpeg
View fullsize Attachment-1 (24).jpeg
View fullsize Attachment-1 (29).jpeg

Other Reviews of Winogrand Color:

The New Yorker What Garry Winogrand Saw in Color - by Vince Aletti January 29, 2024

 The New York Times - When Master Photographers Spin the Color Wheel - by Arthur Lubow January 25, 2024

I had not taken notice of The People’s Pictures by Lee Friedlander until I saw it listed at a sale price.  The book was produced in 2021 by Ekins Press Foundation and was printed in East Greenwich, Rhode Island.

View fullsize webNB DSC_2033_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize webNB DSC_2031_ 01262024.jpg
View fullsize webNB DSC_2030_ 01262024.jpg

I like this book a lot.  The design and printing are good as is the edit and image sequencing.  It is impressive that there are images from five different decades in this book, the combination of the images makes a great documentation of our world.  I love the first section of the book where Friedlander photographs people with cameras, I like to take those kinds of photographs myself.  The second section where he is taking pictures of things with actual photographs in the frame is stylistically different than the documentary street style of the first section, and I see how that could be slightly confusing to someone. But I understand the connection and I think it works well.  The only frustration I have with the book is the lack of written information.  There isn’t an artist statement or much guidance about the collection other than two vague quotes from books that aren’t specifically about the work.  I always think less is more with artist statements and I think it is best for viewers to see photographs and experience them without being influenced by a complex artist statement.  Good images stand on their own and people should have their own unbiased experience with a photograph.  But after that the viewer should be able to compare their experience with the artist statement to see if their experience was similar to what the artist was projecting with the image.  I think I understand well what this catalogue is saying but I still would like confirmation and in some cases more information.  In reading reviews of the book on line I saw some images had more detailed titles than in the book.  For example plate #31 is of a photographer in New York City in 1975 photographing with a Leica.  You can’t see the photographer’s face well, but I think it might be Garry Winogrand.  If it is I would like to know it.  The opposite image in the book is of a pig roast in Cold Spring, NY in 2013, a great photograph.  I want to know why this pairing was made, what deeper statement was being made here.  There are several other images where I know more information about the image exits but its not included in the book because I expect they wanted to keep a simple clean design throughout the book.  I am fine with it; I just wish there was a detailed description in the back of the book that I could reference to learn more.  I paid under $40 for the book which was a great value.  This is a book I would suggest for anyone who likes documentary and street photography.  You will learn something just by looking at the images and even though I mentioned I wanted a little more text information with it, I am fine without it and I think I understand why this book was designed this way.  A fun addition to the library.

View fullsize Cape Cod 1965
Cape Cod 1965
View fullsize Paris, France 1964
Paris, France 1964
View fullsize New York City 1972
New York City 1972
View fullsize Gallup, New Mexico 1983
Gallup, New Mexico 1983
View fullsize New York City 2012
New York City 2012
View fullsize Kentucky 1965
Kentucky 1965
View fullsize Chicago 1966
Chicago 1966
View fullsize Florida 1963
Florida 1963

 

The two other books I had in this order were Los Angeles Portrait of a City (572 pages, 2009) and Dark City: The Real Los Angeles Noir (478 pages, 2018) both published by Taschen America.  These are not fine art photography books but there are good photographs in both books and with my interest in documenting Los Angeles now, there was valuable information in both.  Dark City also interested me because of the law enforcement and evidence photographs it had.  If these books had not been on sale, I would have passed on them but their prices were reasonable, so I went for it.  Jim Heimann authored both books and there is some overlap of content. These are not fine art photography books but both books contain some outstanding photographs and are interesting, especially since I have been documenting Los Angeles more.

View fullsize web+NB+DSC01957_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC01958_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC01960_ 03022024.jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC01962_ 03022024 copy.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC02042_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC01986_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize IMG_2083.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC01993_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC01994_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC01995_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC02000_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize Attachment-1 (35).jpeg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC02036_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC02007_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC02008_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC02016_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC02022_+03022024.jpg
View fullsize web+NB+DSC02004_+03022024.jpg

 

 

 

In Photography Books, Photography, Photography Collector Tags Garry Winogrand, Lee Friedlander, Winogrand Color, Documentary Photography, books, Photography, Photography Book, Jim Heimann, Los Angeles Portrait of a City, Dark City; The Real Los Angeles Noir, The People's Pictures
Comment

Greg Vaughn and Brewers at Scottsdale Stadium - Cactus League Spring Training - Arizona (CL-152 #08 3-16-89)

Photo Lucida Critical Mass 2023 - Finalist Announcement

August 15, 2023

I am honored to announce that my submission to Photo Lucida’s Critical Mass 2023 has been chosen to be a Finalist. This is the third time I have been a Critical Mass Finalist. I was also a Finalist in 2014 & 2016 with law enforcement portfolios. Critical Mass is one of the most prestigious international photography calls for submission there is. It attracts thousands of entries each year from around the world and the jurors for Critical Mass are some of the most renowned photography professionals in the world. 200 photographers are chosen as Finalists and now a panel of 150 jurors will select the 50 Winners.

I also want to congratulate Denise Laurinaitis who is another finalist this year. Denise and I have exhibited together twice this year. First in May at the Atlanta Photography Group’s Portfolio 2023 Exhibition and opening next month in The Decisive Moment juried exhibition at the Photo Place Gallery in Middlebury, Vermont. Denise is a very good emerging artist, and I am always honored to have my photographs exhibited with her work.

This was the first year I submitted images from my Cactus League Portfolio which documents baseball’s Spring Training in Arizona each March. I have been photographing the Cactus League for over 40 years now. With my submission, I selected images which showcase the decline of the number of African American athletes playing professional baseball in recent years as many of those athletes now concentrate on Football or Basketball. Below are the rest of the images in the submission and my statement:

“Black in Baseball" William Karl Valentine

This submission is a selection of images from my Cactus League Baseball portfolio to showcase player demographics changes since I began documenting the sport forty years ago.

African American players only accounted for 6.1% of Major League Baseball’s 2023 opening day rosters.  Of the 945 players only 58 were Black.  The last time the percentage was this low was in 1955 the year before Jackie Robinson retired.  Five teams had no black players and 9 teams only had one player who was black.  29% of Chicago’s 2.75 million residents are black, the city has two baseball teams, and only two black players.

Diversity though is up in baseball, with 269 International players on opening day rosters.  The sad reality is fewer African American athletes are choosing to play baseball when it comes time to select a focus sport in high school, they tend to pursue football and basketball instead of baseball.  Popularity, visibility, marketing, and related attire are suspected factors.  The path to the NFL and NBA may also be easier with many players turning professional after only a year in college.  The prohibited costs of youth travel baseball may also be impacting the numbers of black players. 

Many of baseball’s greatest players have been Black, it is sad to see the decline in numbers today.  Thankfully baseball is working on this by investing in programs to bring these athletes back.  If baseball is to continue as America’s National Pastime it needs more Black players back in the game.

View fullsize CL-051 #38 3-28-86  (Copy)
View fullsize CL-051 #40 3-28-86 (Copy)
View fullsize CL-070 #26 4-3-86  (Copy)
View fullsize CL-092 #25 3-18-87 (Copy)
View fullsize CL-117 #15 3-14-88  (Copy)
View fullsize CL-127 #24  3-15-88  (Copy)
View fullsize CL-193 #14 3-29-91  (Copy)
View fullsize CL-264 #27 3-15-03 (Copy)
View fullsize CL DSC 3394  3/25/13 (Copy)
In Photography, Photography Exhibitions, Spring Training Baseball Tags William Karl Valentine, Cactus League, Arizona, Baseball, Photo Lucida, Critical Mass 2023, Photography, Documentary Photography, Denise Laurinaitis, Atlanta Photography Group, Portfolio 2023, The Decisive Moment, Photo Place Gallery
Comment

BLM Protest - Newport Beach, California (NB DSC 6686 6-06-20)

Picturing Resistance Exhibition at Art Intersection Gallery - Gilbert, Arizona

July 13, 2023

I am proud to announce that legendary photojournalist, and educator, Ken Light has selected three of my photographs for inclusion in the Picturing Resistance Exhibition at Art Intersection Gallery in Gilbert, Arizona. The exhibition runs August 12th through September 30th and includes 59 photographs.

Protest against Governor Newsom’s orders to close the beaches during the Covid Pandemic - Huntington Beach, California (HB DSC 9916 5-01-20)

BLM Protest - Hollywood, California (CA DSC 5652 6-02-20)

I have enjoyed Ken Light’s work for some time, and his books “Texas Death Row” and “Course of the Empire” are in my library. Ken is a great photographer to follow on social media. Not only has he been documenting America, and other parts of the world, for 50 years, but he is also the Reva and David Logan Professor of Photojournalism and curator of the Center for Photography at the Graduate School of Journalism at the University of California Berkeley, so he has knowledge of most all current trends in photography today. Ken posted about this exhibition call on social media and I took the opportunity to get my work in front of his eyes. I didn’t know about Art Intersection before the call but in researching it some it looks like Alan Fitzgerald, the Executive Director, is overseeing a good space with a great photography community. I’m glad to have discovered Art Intersection.

With Ken selecting these images for the exhibition it gives me some validation for my pandemic portfolio which makes me very happy. I think mu pandemic era photographs will become an important documentation of what occurred during the pandemic, especially here in Southern California.

Art Intersection Gallery

207 N. Gilbert Road, Suite 201 - Gilbert, Arizona, 85234 480-361-1118

Gallery Hours: Wednesday - Saturday 10 AM to 6 PM

 
In Street Photography, Photography Exhibitions, Photography, Photographer, Galleries Tags Ken Light, Art Intersection Gallery, Gilbert, Arizona, Picturing Resistance, William Karl Valentine, Documentary Photography, Photography, Photographer, Protests, California
Comment

Chris Field

Chris Field - Visual Engineer

April 22, 2023

I watched an episode of The Green Planet this week and saw at the end where they showcased the inventions of Chris Field that allowed to capture time lapsed images in the rain forest.  The images that Chris’s rigs captured are amazing.  They were basically able to document the process of photosynthesis and show things like the relationship of ants and plants in the rain forest food chain.  The images on their own were beautiful and I continue to be blown away by what the technical advances in cameras allow us to document.  For me when I consider the complexities of the food chain it bolsters my faith, I know science answers many of life’s questions but when I see how well designed our world, I just can’t believe all this happened by a collision of a couple of rocks.  The Green Planet episodes also remind me we need to do better to cherish our planet.

 In the simplest of terms Chris designs camera systems (rails, camera mounts, computer programing of their movement and function) which allow cameras to track and photograph subjects like bugs and plants.  The camera captures time lapse images which are then used to create video.  Some of the lenses he uses are micro lenses with built-in ring lights which allow the camera to photograph tiny creatures in tight dark spaces.  Much like drone cameras, his designs allow the documentation of things most of the world has never seen before.

Being a documentary photographer who works with still images I don’t have the need to use any of the rigs like Chris designs, but I found his story interesting and since it is a photography subject I decided to write a blog post about it.  In researching Chris, I didn’t find a whole lot about him.  The BBC mentioned he was an engineer in the US Military but I don’t see much more on line other than he was based in Colorado and I found his email address. After gathering my links for this post, I decided to something I don’t do much, I reached out to Chris, explained I was doing a post and asked if he would be willing to answer a few questions.  He replied immediately and the time he took to answer my questions exceeded my expectations.  When I read them I knew I picked a great topic for a blog post, his insight is outstanding.  Below are my questions and Chris’s answers:

 

WKV-  I would like to know more about your technical background.  Is there greater detail you can share about your military background and how it gave you the skills needed to create these rigs or inspired your interest in building these.  Was there another background that gave you your technical skill set.

CHRIS - So there is a little bit of confusion there with the whole military engineer thing, I think they should have put a comma between Military and Engineer.  I spent 4 years in the military working on telecommunications. But I never have considered that engineering, but it did give me a great trade to fall on when I got out of the military, I ended up spending 20 more years in Telecommunication working on repair, test and turnup, new product implementation, and was tasked with quite a bit of telecommunication engineering as well as tier 2/3 support for newly developed products. I eventually ended up in charge of my own team. It was a wonderful career which paid well enough for me to really dive into my hobbies. As for mechanical and robotic engineering this has been mostly self-taught over time. A huge part is learning how to use Arduino, they are incredibly useful in this line of work and have an easy learning curve. These devices became critical to learn in order to build out the automation that I needed as there are really no good off the shelf solutions that can coordinate the camera, plumping, motion control, environmental, etc. I remember seeing the end of the tropics episode where it mentioned “Chris Field, an ex-military engineer” and suddenly those words were all over the place and there was not much I could do about it. I think “Chris Field, a self-taught engineer” would have been closer to how I would have written it. While I was in a technical field, the “military” portion makes it sounds like I was doing crazy DARPA stuff. I was in the USAF from 96-2000. I did 4 years and I’m proud of that service and continue the tradition, but it is not something I define myself by.

 

WKV – Did you have an interest in capturing visual scientific information about plants and animals to learn more about them? Is this a business concept where you saw a need and thought you could develop a niche that was profitable? Do you just like complex challenges and building rigs capable of capturing such amazing images just motivates you?

CHRIS - The why stretches back to when I first got into photography and astrophotography. I fell in love with hacking and building, and saw a timelapse with the milky sliding past and I was hooked. I gave up astrophotography overnight and started learning how to do timelapse. A friend of mine and I built a slider, and people started asking us to build them one. That led to a small side business that was ultimately a lot more work than pay. We eventually got burned out and stopped selling them. I had some cameras at that point and a few sliders and wanted to film some stuff, but with it being February in Colorado, it was cold so I bought a hyacinth plant and put it in a spare room in my basement and filmed it blooming. I was mesmerized by the results and started to turn that spare room into a studio.  What I really loved about it was I was producing footage that nobody else was doing. A lot of folks were hiking to beautiful remote locations to film mountains and clouds. But aside from some plant timelapse sequences on BBC documentaries, nobody seemed to be doing it. Probably because it is so difficult and there are a ton of challenges. But it’s really the love of the process and the constant need to overcome challenges that keeps me hooked. I am always building something new, trying a new way to do something, experimenting around.Marketability never really occurred to me, until BBC gave me an offer to work on Green Planet that I could not pass up.

 

WKV- I was wondering about your photography background.  I am a huge fan of Garry Winogrand who has a famous quote: “Photography is not about the thing photographed, It is about how that thing looks photographed.”  Does something like Garry’s statement apply to you? Did you begin building your rigs to capture things you wanted to see but no one had been able to photograph (or video) them yet?    Do you consider yourself an image maker or filmmaker or are you just focused on the technical aspects of creating the rigs?

CHRIS - I really consider myself a visual engineer, which to me means I create solutions to filming difficult things. I love photography, inventing, engineering, and creating stunning visuals. If I won a billion dollars today, tomorrow I would still get up and do the same thing. The financial aspect of this is certainly a bonus as it allows me to focus so much more of my time and energy to this sort of work, but even if I was not getting paid at all and working fulltime elsewhere, I would still keep doing this.

I am so happy I discovered Chris’ work and thankful he took the time to write back. I look forward to seeing more of his work on TV soon, it truly is amazing.

Chris’s company is Biolapse, please visit his website to learn more about his amazing creations.

I found another interesting article about the Triffid 1 system at TVB Europe’ website.

Finally, this is another video related link which has nothing to do with Chris’s work, but I stumbled across it while researching this post and since I don’t deal with video much, I figured best to share this as an add on rather than never use it. It’s a link to an article about the use of shallow depth of field video using mirrorless DSLR camera bodies to capture sports videos. I watch my fair share of sports and have noticed the trend, so it caught my interest.

In Photography, time lapse video Tags Chris Field, The Green Planet, Visual Engineer, Timelapse, Photography, Micro Photography, Camera Slider, BBC, Documentary Films, Documentary Photography, Filmmaking
Comment

Deana Lawson at the High Museum - On view through February 19, 2023

November 28, 2022

Deana Lawson’s photographs were in the Lower-Level Gallery at the High when I visited. This exhibition originated at the Institute of Contemporary Art/Boston (ICA) and was curated by ICA’s Chief Curator Eva Respini along with former MoMA PS1 Chief Curator Peter Eleey. Lawson is a professor at Princeton, and this is the first museum survey dedicated to her work. I was not familiar with Lawson’s work before seeing this exhibition.

I have mixed feelings about this exhibition but taking everything into consideration I did like it, and I think it has value.

The exhibition is staged very well.  The space is amazing, the prints are good, and the work placement is solid. I also think the timing for showing Lawson’s work was perfect and it seemed to be very well received.  I was in the gallery, in the last hour before closing, and I probably saw a couple dozen patrons.  About two thirds of those people were African American, and their engagement with her work was incredible.  Most were in groups of four or people and many appeared to be in their mid-20’s.  People in each group were talking with one another about individual photographs and talking about their response to the work.  They weren’t afraid to get up close and look at details in a photograph, take a cellphone photo of it, step back look over the whole photograph again and then take another close look at it.  It was some of the most interaction with work in a museum I have seen, and everyone seemed excited about the work, as if they were connecting with it personally.  It was a unique energy, and I sensed a lot of people felt this exhibition was specifically for them.  I eventually introduced myself to one of the groups as a visitor from California, mentioned how they looked engaged with the work, asked them what they liked about the exhibition and if there were any photographs that stood out to them.  I may have caught them off guard approaching them in that setting but they were very nice and took a moment to talk with me.  They all thought the prints were beautiful and powerful; I agree with them, the scale of the work is perfect and printing quality very good.  The consensus was they thought the work showed the people featured in a positive light and highlighted their strengths.  Both the men and the women in the group seemed to be drawn more to prints with female nudes.  I saw every group stop and spend time to examine the montage of photographs pinned to the wall, that piece (feature above) definitely got everyone’s attention. This exhibition does an outstanding job of fulfilling the High’s mission goals.  I suspect the Lawson exhibition is bringing in new patrons who may not have considered the High as being a place for them before this exhibition went up.  It is also nice to see the work of a photographer under 50 get an exhibition of this caliber.

View fullsize web ATL DSC 9059_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 09030_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 09038_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 09028_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 9063_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 9066_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 9076_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 9079_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_9309 10-20-22 APG.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 09048_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_9305 10-20-22 APG.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 9081_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg

One of the people I spoke with showing me which Lawson photograph he liked best on cellphone

Okay so now I need to address why I have mixed feelings about this exhibition.  I think it is best to start with Lawson’s exhibition statement about the work to get a better understanding of it:  

“Featuring work made over the past two decades, this exhibition is the first museum survey dedicated to Deana Lawson. Working primarily in photography, Lawson investigates and challenges conventional representations of Black identities and bodies. Her work evokes a range of photographic histories and styles, including family albums, studio portraiture, and staged tableaux; she also employs documentary pictures and appropriated images.

In Lawson’s highly staged scenes, individuals, couples, and families are pictured in intimate domestic spaces and public settings, interacting with one another. The artist describes her work as “a mirror of everyday life, but also a projection of what I want to happen. It’s about setting a different standard of values and saying that everyday Black lives, everyday experiences, are beautiful, and powerful, and intelligent.” Lawson’s practice is global in scope, as she creates her images throughout the African diaspora in locations as varied as Brooklyn, Haiti, Jamaica, Ethiopia, Brazil, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the Southern United States. This broad geographical range points to a collective memory of shared experiences and various cultural histories of the past.”

What I am struggling with is that so many of these images look to be documentary photographs, but they are actually carefully staged, and the environment altered.  If they were straight documentary images, they would be powerful, they would be capturing life within a segment of our population and thus allowing us to explore and appreciate it.  But when Laswon alters them, she alters their factual value.  I love Julie Blackmon’s work, it is amazing.  With Blackmon’s work it is obviously staged and orchestrated.  As a viewer knowing this, when I see her photographs, I know I need to look for her message in her image.  Blackmon usually has an obvious message with subtle layers of messages.  Taking Deana Lawsons’ statement and applying it to her images I can’t always see the connection.

Here are some examples:

“Sons of Cush” - Deana Lawson 2016

View fullsize web ATL DSC 09042_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 09043_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 09044_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_9291 10-20-22 High.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_9293 10-20-22 High.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_9294 10-20-22 High.jpg

So, Lawson said this about her work: “it is a mirror of everyday life, but also a projection of what I want to happen. It’s about setting a different standard of values and saying that everyday Black lives, everyday experiences, are beautiful, and powerful, and intelligent.” When I view this image, I see examples of everyday life, but I am confused what the different standards and values she is championing here because there is so much going on.  Obviously, there is the suggestion of the proud father caring for his son which stands out.  But then when I consider the title is “Sons of Cush” (“Cush” is slang for a powerful type of marijuana with a high that lasts a long time), the tattoos, gold chains, and cash on the person to the left, the aluminum foil preventing people from looking inside apartment, with my background in law enforcement I start to connect this image with drugs dealers.  I have no idea where the white board is taking us, references to colonization in Africa along with scripture verse, it is all over the place.  Then there is the apparent photo of an older black woman who had been a nanny to a white girl and an empty Chips Ahoy cup on the side table and so many other elements added to the photograph.  Plus, the fact that the photograph is staged with all this furniture next to the front door (I can see the dead bolt lock) in an awkward unnatural manner is something I don’t understand.  In reading Patricia Davis’s comments about the photograph on the accompanying title card (a photo of this is above) I see this photograph is about the strong father figure and the rejection of the stereotype that some African American men are poor fathers and that the “Sons of Cush” title relates back to the Kingdom of Kush in Africa.  Okay I can see the father element in the photograph but what about all these unique components in the image frame? Is there is a reason for them? and if my interpretation is correct about the house then as a good father why is he still in there with the child?  If the message is only about the man being a good father to his son, rejecting stereotypes, I think the image could have been created where that statement is clearer. If there are multiple layers of meaning to this image, then I wish Davis would have identified them. I also don’t see how the image “Cleverly prompts the viewer to make the connection” that this is a strong father figure as Davis claims. If the meaning of this image was so obvious, then Davis’s statement would not need to accompany the work.

“Uncle Mack” - Deana Lawson 2016

Knowing that “Uncle Mack” was a posed photograph I want to know why it was framed like a Polaroid snapshot with those elements in the frame.  He is holding a shotgun, but it is a hunting style gun with a long barrel.  Mack is shirtless, he is wearing a cross necklace, has no tattoos, and the house décor is generic.  He is standing in the corner by a window.  I have absolutely no idea where Lawson is taking us with this image.  In today’s world guns always bring out negative connotations or suggest the presence of a threat, but Uncle Mack looks like an average guy in an average house.  The exhibition plate just had the title nothing more.

View fullsize web ATL DSC 9054_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web ATL DSC 9056_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg

I think this is powerful portrait, I see strength and some simultaneous vulnerability.  I think the interior is an important part of the documentation too, but I am not following the unicorn toy and the TV remote placement. Is it a suggestion she is a parent while still being a woman? As soon as I knew that Lawson carefully constructed her images, I paid attention to every detail assuming each was another key to the meaning of the image. If the items are not important elements that is okay but then they become distractions if they appear to be out of place.

Mohawk Correctional Facility installation:

View fullsize web ATL DSC 09032_ 10-20-2022 High Museum.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_9277 10-20-22 High.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_9279 10-20-22 High.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_9280 10-20-22 High.jpg

The Mohawk Correctional Facility family portrait installation is outstanding.  I know Lawson rephotographed her cousin Jazmin’s snapshots from visiting her partner Erik in prison, but I am fine with that because she curated the photographs into a timeline and this installation in the High is perfect.  The timeline positioning is very powerful.  With my law enforcement background, I have seen snapshots like theses lots of times and I understand the dynamics these families go through when a parent is serving a prison sentence.

Conclusion:

As a whole Lawson’s exhibition has value.  Some of her portraits are very powerful and hit the mark well.  As I detailed above, I find the message in parts of this exhibition difficult to understand and I think there maybe ways that could be corrected, in some cases maybe just with more detailed signage.  I was interested in seeing other opinions on this exhibition, but I really wasn’t able to find reviews of this exhibition online. I found a few announcements about it, but they never seemed to go beyond repeating the initial exhibition announcement. I was very pleased to see the amount of community connection to the work and for that fact alone I think this exhibition is a success.

In Museums Tags Deana Lawson, High Museum, Atlanta, Photography
Comment

Jackson Fine Art - Atlanta

November 20, 2022

I have known about Jackson Fine Art in Atlanta, and of their reputation as one of the nation's top private galleries, for years.  I have casually followed who they were exhibiting in the past, but I had never seen their space.  So, when I was in Atlanta last month for my opening of the Atlanta Photography Group’s 2022 Selects Exhibition, I made a point to stop by Jackson and finally see their gallery.

The gallery is a converted residence in the Buckhead shopping district neighborhood of north Atlanta.  The gallery layout is a little unique, but it works well the way they designed it.

I planned my Atlanta trip last minute, so I was not able to make arrangements to visit Jackson beforehand; so, this was a complete cold call on my part. I just wanted to see their space and hopefully introduce myself to someone on the staff.

The visit exceeded my expectations, Gallery Director Coco Conroy and the staff were so nice, and Coco was gracious enough to spend half an hour showing me the current exhibition and talking about the gallery. We even were able to talk briefly about my own work and Coco was even able to introduce me to the owner, Anna Walker Skillman.  I can see why Jackson has the reputation and client list that they do, everyone is professional, and their artist roster and inventory is large.

With Gallery Director Coco Conroy - Jackson Fine Art

Jackson was featuring the work of Tabitha Soren, who they represent, when I was there.  Soren is a former MTV reporter and is married to Michael Lewis who authored the famous book “Money Ball”.  Her prints are often individually unique.  For her images from her “Relief” portfolio she damaged the print surface by causing small holes (from an airsoft gun or knife) or even burned some prints slightly to use that damage to create a finished work that better captured her feelings; the damage added an interesting element of texture to the photographs. Prints from her “Surface Tension” portfolio were also on exhibit.  These large prints were made from 8”x 10” negatives where she photographed the reflective surfaces of iPads with vernacular images on the screen.  She was interested in capturing the viewers fingerprints on the surface of the iPad to highlight the connection between the viewer and the electronic device.  Soren’s photographs allow for a lot of viewer interpretation and for me they seemed to have lots of layers of meaning.

I would strongly recommend Jackson Fine Arts for anyone interested in purchasing photographs in the region. Jackson has a national client base and provides services to many top institutions as well as collectors.  Hopefully I will have a chance to visit Jackson again soon as well as spending more time with Coco talking about photography.

Jackson Fine Art
3115 East Shadowlawn Avenue
Atlanta, GA 30305

info@jacksonfineart.com

Tel 404.233.3739
Fax 404.233.1205

Tuesday - Saturday, 10am - 5pm 

View fullsize IMG_9528.jpg
View fullsize IMG_9527.jpg
View fullsize IMG_9526.jpg
 
In Art Collection, Galleries, Photography, Photography Collector Tags Jackson Fine Art, Atlanta, Coco Conroy, William Karl Valentine, Photography, Tabitha Soren, Michael Lewis, Moneyball
Comment

LACMA’s Wallis Annenberg Photography Department Curator Rebecca Morse by Robert Heineken’s images.

"Objects of Desire" - curated by Rebecca Morse - LACMA through December 18th 2022

November 16, 2022

On October 7th I had the incredible opportunity to spend two hours talking one on one with Rebecca Morse at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art viewing the exhibition “Objects of Desire”.

Rebecca Morse is coming up on her 10-year anniversary as a Curator in the Wallis Annenberg Photography Department at LACMA. Prior to LACMA she spent 15 years as a curator at MOCA in Los Angeles. Originally from upstate New York, Rebecca worked for a commercial photographer in New York City and earned her Master’s degree at the University of Arizona before moving to Los Angeles. Rebecca curated the “Objects of Desire” exhibition and authored the accompanying catalogue for the exhibition.

Here is LACMA’s Statement for the exhibition:

“Objects of Desire: Photography and the Language of Advertising traces the artistic manipulation of advertising, the most powerful, mainstream visual language. Since the 1970s, creative innovations led to dramatic shifts in the possibilities for photography as artistic expression, as photo-based artists reworked advertising strategies to challenge the increased commodification of daily life, and later to appropriate the command these images have over the viewer/consumer. By exploiting advertising’s visual vocabulary and adopting its sites and formats, and through re-photography, appropriation, and simulation, artists create a shared photographic language that puts the onus on the viewer to determine what exactly these pictures are asking of us.”

I appreciate diversity in photographic styles although I always gravitate toward documentary images because that is my style. I think it is important that all genres of photography are showcased, and I try to view as many different types of photographs as I can to keep up my knowledge of the medium.  Viewing other images and talking about photography always helps me refocus on my own work.  My expectation in viewing Objects of Desire was that I would learn something new and hopefully see a couple images I could connect with.

The Objects of Desire exhibition exceeded my expectations. It is truly amazing, one of the tightest exhibitions I have seen.  It has some images I was familiar with, some work by photographers I had never heard of, and some totally unique pieces like Urs Fishcer’s “Mirror Box” series.  What made this exhibition so outstanding is how Rebecca Morse curated and designed the installation such that seemingly eclectic works when put together are in fact totally congruent with the goal of the exhibition.  The pairings make perfect sense when you follow the chronology and sequence of the installation.

Obviously, there is nothing like viewing an exhibition with the curator who is sharing insights on how they constructed the exhibition. That was a huge advantage for me.  But if the average viewer follows the wall signage the story is laid out in a clear, concise and easy way to understand manner.  I don’t think Rebecca missed a single detail; the show accomplishes exactly what the statement says.

View fullsize web CA DSC 08326  10-07-22.jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC 08325  10-07-22.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_8741 LACMA Obkects of Desire 10-07-22.jpg

I had never met Rebecca before, and I earned this private tour by winning a fundraising bid for the Los Angeles Center of Photography, so I didn’t fully know what to expect.  What I discovered is an amazing photography professional. 

I gained a ton of insight into the curator’s mind with this visit, which was one of my goals.  Rebecca talked about how the concept for the exhibition formulated over many years, and as I expected her interests and experience were the foundation.  There was one specific image (Ericka Beckman’s 1987 image “Spoonful”) I had never seen before.  Rebecca explained that she had seen the photograph years ago, how the image stayed in the back of her mind, and when she had the right exhibition for it, she remembered it.  We also talked a lot about presentation and design of the space. I loved hearing about the many details and fine adjustments, and I could see how each thing she mentioned made the exhibition better.  We ended up talking about every piece.  I knew that Rebecca had worked with Robert Heineken when she was at the University of Arizona and the Center for Creative Photography was adding Heineken’s archive to their collection.  I enjoyed the opportunity to talk to Rebecca about his work given her firsthand connection to it and that’s why I made a point to photograph Rebecca by Heineken’s work. 

View fullsize Sarah Charlesworth: Figures, 1983-84, Cibachrome with lacquered wood frame, 2 panels, 42 by 32 inches each
Sarah Charlesworth: Figures, 1983-84, Cibachrome with lacquered wood frame, 2 panels, 42 by 32 inches each
View fullsize Vikky Alexander’s “St. Sebastian”
Vikky Alexander’s “St. Sebastian”
View fullsize  Urs Fishcer’s “Mirror Box” series
Urs Fishcer’s “Mirror Box” series
View fullsize  Asha Schechter’s 2020 print “Junk Drawer”
Asha Schechter’s 2020 print “Junk Drawer”

I found it particularly interesting when Rebecca pointed out the reflective qualities of Sarah Charlesworth’s Cibachrome “Figures” and Vikky Alexander’s “St. Sebastian” and how the viewer’s reflection on the surface of the prints was such an important element of the viewer’s experience.  The importance of the reflective quality of Urs Fishcer’s “Mirror Box” series was more apparent, but in talking with Rebecca I learned the placement of each box had been carefully considered.  If a box was moved one way or another the reflected background would be completely different.  Asha Schechter’s 2020 print “Junk Drawer” is unlike any other exhibition photograph I have ever seen. It is an inkjet print on adhesive vinyl and it was made specifically for this exhibition and the precise location in the gallery where the print hangs. The drawer which was photographed to create the image has reflective surfaces although the print itself does not have reflective qualities. But when you look at the print it appears those reflective surfaces are mirroring the lights and other objects in the room because Schechter actually photographed the room during installation and added those elements to his print to appear as if they are reflections. The perspective of the drawer also seems off with the back of the drawer appearing to be bigger than the front of the drawer which is closest to the viewer. In the catalogue Rebecca describes this print as being based on reality but feeling “off kilter”, she’s right, I found it to be subtly bothersome and I respect that.

I also enjoyed listening to her thoughts on the scale of certain pieces and the overall design element regarding placement of work.  I know how much effort I put in to editing my own work, it takes a lot of time and focus, but to hear Rebecca talk about her curatorial process for an exhibition of this scale is a completely different level.

View fullsize web NB DSC08318_ 10072022_2.jpg
View fullsize web NB DSC08336_ 10072022_1.jpg

One other thing I enjoyed on my visit was watching other patrons view the exhibition.  Rebecca also liked being in the gallery when no one realized she was the exhibition curator so she could stand back and see what people were drawn to and how they experienced the exhibition.

View fullsize IMG_0135.jpg
View fullsize IMG_0132.jpg
View fullsize IMG_0125.jpg
View fullsize IMG_0129.jpg
View fullsize IMG_0134 (1).jpg
View fullsize IMG_0133.jpg
View fullsize IMG_0126.jpg
View fullsize IMG_0130.jpg

Rebecca also authored the accompanying catalogue for the exhibition which is one of the best exhibition catalogues I have ever seen.  It explains the overall exhibition nicely and showcases many details about individual works.  If you get the book and read the Acknowledgements you also get insight in to how many people are involved in producing an exhibition of this scale too, it definitely takes a good team. David Karwan designed the catalogue and he did a fantastic job capturing the magazine / advertising spirit in a beautifully published book.  LACMA co-published the book with DelMonico  Books.

The Exhibition runs until December 18th, and I highly recommend a visit.

 
In Museums, Photography Books, Photography Exhibitions Tags William Karl Valentine, Rebecca Morse, Robert Heineken, Sarah Charlesworth, Vikky Alexander, Urs Fishcer, Ericka Beckman, Center for Creative Photography, LACMA, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, MOCA, David Karwan, Los Angeles Center of Photography, DelMonico Books, Photography, Objects of Desire, Asha Schechter
Comment

Chrisopher Makos signing “Andy Modeling Portfolio”: at Fahey/Klein Gallery

Christopher Makos at Fahey Klein Gallery - Los Angeles

November 14, 2022

Fahey/Klein has long been one of the West Coast’s most influential photography galleries.  Founded in 1986 by David Fahey and Randee Klein Devlin their 3,800 sq ft gallery houses an incredible 8,000 print inventory and has consistently showcased a diverse group of photographers throughout the years.

I had not been inside Fahey/Klein since before the pandemic so when I was up at Gallery 825 in September, I made a point to stop by and see what was showing.

As it turns out I caught the last day of an exhibition of Steve Arnold’s “Theophanies”.  The prints were exquisite and the exhibition well curated, but the subject matter did not interest me.  Still, it is always a good experience to see diverse works to keep you own saw sharpened.

The gallery traffic was light because it was near the end of the day, and this gave me the opportunity to speak at length with Nicole Boyle who is an Archiving Intern at the gallery.  Nicole took the time to go through their collection room with me to answer some of my questions and just chat some about photography.  I always love meeting gallery staff like Nicole who are passionate about the medium.  There are few things worse for me than visiting a gallery which isn’t busy and has disinterested staff.  At the end of the chat Nicole told me about their upcoming Steven Makos exhibition and book signing the following Saturday and invited me to attend.  So, this blog post is because Nicole was engaging and motivated me to come back up to buy a book and see the exhibition.

View fullsize web IMG_8587 Fahey Klein 1.jpg
View fullsize web IMG_8589 Fahey Klein 2.jpg

As a documentary photographer, and a fan of Andy Warhol, I really liked this exhibition – Christopher Makos “Fringe” which runs through this coming Saturday. A couple images I saw seemed familiar, but I saw many images for the first time. Makos was in Andy’s circle, so he had great access to an incredible period in the art world. The prints in the exhibition are very nice and some are editions of 1 which made this viewing even that much more special. If you are in Los Angeles now, and a Warhol fan, I strongly suggest you get over to La Brea before this show comes down.

I find the book, “Andy Modeling Portfolio”, to be rather interesting. The book is basically a collection of studio portraits of Andy Warhol. If Warhol wasn’t the subject, then this book would never have been made, seeing multiple portraits of the same individual usually ends up telling us more about the photographer and their “eye” than the individual being photographed. But Warhol knew he was a brand and was always conscious of that when he was interacting with the world. I have no doubt that Warhol played a big part in the majority of these poses because so many have his signature look. For sure Christopher was staging the images but Warhol probably often took it from there. So that makes the book interesting for me, especially after having seen the Warhol exhibition at the Whitney Museum on two separate occasions (one of the best art exhibitions I've ever seen). The printing quality of the book is perfect for the subject matter since this portfolio is like a collection of test prints and proof sheets. If it was a grand higher-end printing on a larger scale the book wouldn’t have worked as well, as it is I think they nailed it.

View fullsize 1 IMG_9994.jpg
View fullsize 1 IMG_9993.jpg
View fullsize 1 IMG_9995.jpg
View fullsize 1 IMG_9999.jpg
View fullsize 1 IMG_9996.jpg
View fullsize 1 IMG_9998.jpg

One thing I discovered with researching information for this post is how interesting David Fahey’s own portfolio of work is.  David studied photography and was photographing well before he got into the gallery business.  David was insightful enough early on to realize there would be value in photographing the photographers he worked with.  I found his photographs online and they immediately remind me very much of photo historian Bill Jay’s photographs.  I studied under Bill Jay at Arizona State University, and I even remember being in the darkroom with him once while he was printing some of those images.  It then hit me what an awesome experience I had in the gallery that day while someone like David was photographing Christopher Makos.  I also realized, and found it interesting, that David had also photographed Warhol.

The story of the photograph below:

I was one of the last people there to get a book signed so I had time to talk with Cristopher.  I had already walked around and viewed the exhibition before getting in line to have him sign my bool plus I had read up some about the exhibition online before heading up there.  I knew there was a print of Andy Warhol wearing a red clown’s nose that was a single edition vintage print and I really liked it.  But I noticed there was an oddity (a small circular shape like something had blocked the exposure of the paper) in the lower right corner of the image so I asked Christopher about that, I wanted to know why that was there.  He wasn’t sure what I was asking about so I suggested we all walk over to it, and I would point it out.  Christopher agreed and three or four of us, including David, walked over to the print with him.  He was surprised I had noticed the detail and said it had no meaning and hypothesized he had used something to hold the paper flat during printing, but it had moved up and covered that corner of the easel during the exposure.  I took the opportunity to photograph Christopher as he was talking about the print and at the same time, I could hear David was behind me also photographing him.  My photograph below is from that moment.  At the time I knew I had captured a good image, but after learning more about David Fahey’s photography my image now has a deeper personal meaning. 

Christopher with a single edition print of Andy

One last fantastic thing I discovered while authoring this post is that Fahey/Klein has been creating video interviews of their artists and their projects recently. These videos are an outstanding resource and I appreciate that David had the vision and resources to document these photographers and events.

Click her to see the Christopher Makos video.

Other interesting links about David Fahey:

Anthony Friedkin’s 2014 interview of David Fahey for Samy’s Camera

The Eye of Photography article on David Fahey.

View fullsize web CA DSC08103_ 10-01-2022  LA Fahey Klein.jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC08107_ 10-01-2022  LA Fahey Klein.jpg
 
In Galleries, Artist Tags David Fahey, Fahey Klein Gallery, Christopher Makos, Andy Warhol, Los Angeles, Photography, Art Books, Andy Modeling Portfoio, Nicole Boyle, Bill Jay
Comment

Andy Adams

Andy Adams launches FlakPhoto Digest newsletter

September 13, 2022

Andy gives this online description of himself:

Andy is a cultural producer + digital director. He has consulted with arts organizations and cultural institutions that use the Internet to engage and educate the public since 2004.

In 2006, he founded FlakPhoto Projects, an online digital/arts lab promoting photography + visual culture.

Andy also hosts the FlakPhoto Network, an 18,000-member online community focused on conversations about visual/media culture.

Like 50,000 + other people I have been following Andy Adams and his FlakPhoto on Instagram for a while. I always appreciated the images he shared, and the conversations he raised, with his posts. I was in awe of, and jealous of, his passion and energy for the medium of photography and his ability to dedicate so much of his life to the medium. I also like the fact that his posts have that feel of Midwestern nice. Even if I didn’t like an image, or disagreed with a concept, it never bothered me because his presentation of different material was usually unbiased and always professional. It was so refreshing that in our divided world today someone still understood how to present different ideas in a way that encouraged dialogue not division.

On September 8th Andy announced he was going to launch FlakPhoto Digest, a subscription digital newsletter. Andy decided on using this platform to showcase his material because he thought it was a better way to share content. Like most of us, Andy has become frustrated with the current state of social media and was looking for a better way to get the information to his audience.

With the announcement of the FlakPhoto Digest, Andy also asked photographers to email him to tell him about themselves, their work, and provide links to their work. I sent an email with my information last weekend and got a reply email two days later thanking me for signing up and asking me to spread the word about his project. I know it had to be a cut and paste reply with the volume of emails he received but I was impressed that he took the time to personalize it, so I decided to author this blog post about his project to honor that request. I know over 2,000 photographers have already signed up for the newsletter, and I know some of you reading this post already know all about Andy and FlakPhoto, but if you haven’t checked out FlakPhoto yet please do. I also encourage you to sign up for the newsletter, knowing the content Andy has shared in the past I am confident the Digest will quickly become a top resource for contemporary photography.

FlakPhoto Digest Newsletter Link

Andy Adams Bio Link

In Photography Tags Andy Adams, FlakPhoto, FlakPhotoDigest, Online photography community, Photography
Comment

Brianna Kupfer was stabbed to death inside her work on 1-13-22, the suspect was arrested on 1-19-22 in Pasadena several hours before I photographed this memorial at the murder scene.

Brianna Kupfer Murder Scene - 326 N. La Brea, Los Angeles

January 22, 2022

I remember standing over a guy once who had just been shot in his apartment.  There was a drive-by on the street out front and instead of taking cover he went to the bedroom window to look and caught what appeared to be a stray round meant for someone else.  He was a “Veterano” so I was somewhat surprised he did that, I expected he would know better.   We had arrived on scene right after it happened, and paramedics were close behind us. Medically there wasn’t anything I could do for him beside encourage him to keep fighting to stay alive.  His breathing was shallow, and he was not saying anything.  His color started to fade and by the time the paramedics transported him his skin was turning grey, I knew he was going to die, and he did soon after reaching the hospital.  I have seen a few murder victims die; most I guess were in shock because they were not saying much.  I have also seen someone who was shot and made it, he was scared and calling out for his mother as he was laying there on the ground.  Watching someone in the process of dying an unnatural death is surreal.  I’ve sensed some people giving in to their wounds and death’s call, while seeing others fighting with all they had to survive.  I have sensed fight, fear, regret, loneliness, and calm witnessing the dying process.

I went to the Croft House to photograph Brianna Kupfer’s memorial because I saw it as opportunity to document an incident which represents our society today, raging crime and the deterioration of safety in our communities.

What happened to Brianna showcases everything that has and is going wrong with the new approach to the American criminal justice system in a supposed “woke” society.  It is beyond unacceptable that Shawn Laval Smith, the murder suspect, was still roaming the streets after at least 11 previous arrests and his obvious mental health issues.  At a minimum he should have been in a mental health facility years ago, instead, somehow, he was most likely shipped to California from South Carolina so they could get rid of their problem quickly.  Based on all his criminal history Law Enforcement did their job, they arrested him and brought him before the courts. The system from there obviously did not do their part by putting Mr. Smith in some type of custody where he could not harm others.  Every day there are incidents of violent attacks on innocent people by unstable persons living on our streets.  This past week the victims included a nurse at a Los Angeles bus stop and an accounting consultant on a New York subway platform, plus who knows how many others. 

I feel my images from the Croft House accurately convey my feelings about Brianna’s murder and allow for thought and interpretation by other viewers.  I see them as powerful documents of what happened, even though they do not actually document the criminal act or crime scene. I hope these photographs allow some viewers the ability to consider the reality of such a horrific loss and contemplate society’s approach to public safety moving forward. I think there are many layers for the viewers to deal with in these images. 

When I photograph, I try and be respectful of the people within my frames and not exploitative. With an incident like this, I was looking for images with deeper meaning, not just a press image where I was looking for dramatic shot to illustrate a story before moving on. 

Here are some of my thoughts on specific images:

The wide-angle view of the entire store worked well. The lead image in this blog captured how intimate this furniture store is by documenting its scale. I used a 14-24mm Nikon Aspherical lens for this since the sidewalk is so narrow and news vans were parked all in front of Croft House. For me I see the outside of the building with all the big windows as a location I would never expect a violent crime to occur. The wide-angle lens also captured the volume of flowers well. In the image above the young man walking past the wanted poster of Smith symbolizes much of society for me. Something horrific happened here, I want everyone to take notice and be enraged about it, but this man appears to be walking by as if he is oblivious to that fact. I imagine him saying to himself: “Oh well something bad happened here, thankfully it wasn’t me, bad things happen all the time, just accept it, I have things to do, it’s nothing I have to deal with.”. Obviously, I don’t know this young man’s thoughts, nor do I know if he has already walked by here multiple times and has already stopped to experience the moment. His presence in the frame, although a documented fact, is really only symbolic of life going on and people passing by. I also think his attire helps with the documentation of the area and the people who live here.

This image is intense for me. The arrangement is so beautiful, as was Brianna Kupfer, the flowers are representative of her. The interior of the store is organized and clean. There is order in the display and the designs of the pieces are awesome, the space looks cool, normally I would love to check out. But then there is the reality that order was shattered by the blade of the murderer’s knife. The reflection of the news van and the wanted poster in the window tell the horrific truth. Having seen the coverage of the murder on television I know the suspect had walked right where I was now standing to make this photograph. Perhaps he peered into this same window before he entered Croft House. He interacted with Brianna in such a way that she became so scared of him she texted a friend about him, he then savagely murdered Brianna, before comely walking out the back door of the store and North up the ally. The most chilling part is the rear door of the store is so clearly visible in this image and positioned just to the left of the wanted flyer for the suspect. This image brings to my mind the terror Brianna must have endured at the end of her life, how alone she must have felt.

I assume this image above is pretty obvious for most viewers. Televised news is so influential today. Here I have the production crew for the live shot, masks documenting the period, and mobile equipment which reminds the viewer that the crew is only on scene temporarily before moving on to the next story. Society’s focus on this event will quickly fade, and then I think of her family who will carry the scars of this loss forever. I am angered with the thought that victims, and their families are not the focus today. The slight view of the memorial in the background wanted poster giving context to their story. The reporters practiced speaking their copy while the crews checked their lighting and camera angles. They were doing their jobs, they were not being disrespectful, but the reality was obvious this wasn’t personal for them, it was just another tough story, it probably has to be that way in their business. Maybe this image also represents public desensitization to crime.

View fullsize web CA DSC_0109 01 19 2022 - Kupfer Murder on La Brea c.jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_0130 01 19 2022 - Angie Crouch - Kupfer Murder on La Brea c.jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_4582 01 19 2022 - Kupfer Murder on La Brea c.jpg

A few more images of the news crews, I specifically liked the woman casually walking by NBC’s Angie Crouch as she prepared for her segment, again symbolic of the acceptance of the reality of our society today.

I personally have no respect for District Attorney Gascon so when I found this sign here when I arrived, I was happy someone else had made this statement. It is good that there is an element of anger along with celebrating the Brianna’s life and mourning her loss. The old metal security gate is also an important element in all these images, adds to the layers.

The powerful element in this image is subtle but strong. Just before I photographed it someone came up and asked a couple questions about the murder. He seemed like he didn’t want to believe such a violent act could have happened there, I assume he lived in that Hancock Park neighborhood. He read the wanted poster, then put his hands up to the glass so he could get a better view of the store’s interior. It was obvious he was trying to comprehend what had happened, I assume he felt compassion for the victim and quite possibly fear for his own well-being. It would have been a great photograph of him peering in the window, but I didn’t take it. I guess I wanted to let him have his moment to himself. The smudges on the window are a good representation of everyone who had stopped and peered inside. I am sure many were fearful they would see a bloody crime scene but at the same time they were too curious to not look. From that point I can imagine people thinking thank God that wasn’t me or my daughter.

View fullsize web CA DSC_0106 01 19 2022 - Kupfer Murder on La Brea.jpg
View fullsize web CA DSC_0108 01 19 2022 - Kupfer Murder on La Brea c.jpg

I liked the image of the vigil flyer; it is a simple document that gains value with the Christian candles. The note in the right-side image stood out to me. It isn’t the typical card you write on when you send flowers. It’s a page ripped from a small personal notebook. I don’t know any facts about who wrote this, but I can envision someone who stopped to view the memorial feeling the emotion of the loss and having a need to do something to share with others how they felt. For me the note is so genuine and personal, I love it, especially with the shapes and forms of the image, the beautiful, delicate flowers, and their contrast to the iron security gate. More layers of interpretation with this image than are initially obvious.

This may be the most powerful of my images that day, even though it was such an obvious image. I was lucky to be there when the sunlight was at a perfect angle to illuminate Brianna’s portrait and the wanted flyers taped to the window. The light also gave me interesting hard shadows in the store with an interesting element of a reflection of a security fence in the top of the frame; for me those elements allude to the darkness of the crime. Again, the staging of the portrait reminds me how unexpected it was to have a homicide occur at a location like Croft House. I don’t know who photographed the actual portrait, it is a solid portrait which I assumed captured Brianna’s personality. I felt a little weird photographing someone else’s photograph but with all the other elements in my frame I knew it was totally appropriate.

Hopefully I will find fewer things like this to photograph in the future and that I will never have to fully comprehend the pain Brianna Kupfer’s family is experiencing now. I will keep documenting my world because that is how I experience life and I trust these images will also have an impact on everyone who views them.

In Photography, Street Photography Tags Croft House, Brianna Kupfer, 326 N. La Brea, Los Angeles, California, 187 PC, Murder, Crime Scene, Gascon, Shawn Laval Smith, Documentary Photography, Photography, Street Photography, Crime Scene Photography
Comment

Grand Central Terminal

New York Photographs - January 2019

November 13, 2021

I just uploaded over 30 photographs from January 17th 2019 to my New York portfolio on my website.  This blog post is to announce that and mention a few of the images which are standing out to me.

I was in Connecticut for a week and took the train in to New York City photograph that day.  The light was good that day with no clouds.  The windchill had the temperature down to about 18 degrees which did not feel that cold to me. My Nikon D500 though didn’t like the cold and shut down, luckily, I usually carry multiple cameras on trips like this do I was fine. 

I am hopeful this blog post and update to my New York Portfolio with give view some insights to how I photograph.  So often when I am in New York I will pick a few museums or galleries (Howard Greenburg in the Fuller Building is a favorite) I want to see that day and map out a straight-line route to start from.  From there I walk and usually only stop to make camera adjustments or review images.  Back in the day I would stop to change film and make notations on the canister but even with a Leica if needed I could walk and change film at the same time.  Walking five miles in a day happens often, depends on the stops and what I come across.  It is rare I stay in one location too long; the city moves and so I to as well.  I also try and blend into the scene as I photograph so moving with the flow helps accomplish that.  Moving also reduces becoming a victim since I am usually alone when I photograph.  I am mindful of the sun when choosing my routes and which side of the street I am on.  Back in the day T-Max 400 film at f/8 and 1/500th was probably my most common setting and I used a Sekonic hand meter.  Today I am often on shutter priority at 1/800th.  I appreciate the ability digital images give me to proof instantly, especially in tough lighting conditions.

View fullsize web+NY+DSC+00402++1-17-2019+COR.jpg
View fullsize web NY DSC 00449  1-17-2019.jpg
View fullsize web NY DSC 00506  1-17-2019.jpg
View fullsize web NY DSC 00494  1-17-2019.jpg

I am drawn to these images above because there is a perceived sense of tension between the people in the images. Our world today is full of tension, and the weight of those tensions have been relentless on us for years. Relationships between people, and individuals to society are not as good as they should be today.

This grouping of Warhol paintings at the Whitney is probably the most epic grouping of art pieces I have ever seen in a museum.  The grouping sums up so much about our world and life for me.  Senior Curator Donna De Salvo, Senior Curatorial Assistant Christie Mitchell, and Curatorial Research Associate Mark Loiacono organized the exhibition, so I assume one or all of them deserve credit for it.  When I saw the person with the support dog and the other man facing the cross in front of Warhol’s work, I had my image. I know I have written about it before but I will say it again, the Warhol retrospective was amazing, incredible how much work they gathered for it and the presentation in the space was perfect.

I know some people might think it is odd for me to photograph in galleries and museums where other art is on the walls.  I often find myself with the desire to photograph as a means to experience something.  I like to document moments and retain memories; the camera allows me to do that.  Over time I have often found the juxtaposition viewers have with the artwork on the walls cab create new images of value.  Plus, I am always aware of potential images, it is just how I see the world.

View fullsize web NY DSC 00552  1-17-2019.jpg
View fullsize web NY DSC 00459  1-17-2019.jpg
View fullsize web NY DSC 1722 1-17-2019.jpg
View fullsize web NY DSC 00694  1-17-2019.jpg

When I first went to photograph in New York in 1988 one of the things I was drawn to were the banks of payphones throughout the city and how many people congregated there. Over the years we have seen pay phones fade away as cell phones have made them obsolete.  That transition changed the images I was finding in the city.  Before many people I photographed walked with their heads up, looking straight ahead to avoid interaction.  Now people seem to use their cell phones for this.  Their phones give them a false sense of protection and a means to distance themselves from others.  I now look for images specifically with people and their cellphones when I photograph, I think those images can make strong statements about the world we live in today.

I like the graphic element of this image above and the style of these two women who I assume are mother and daughter.  This image can be unpacked so many ways depending on the viewer.  Some may see it as a statement about wealth and privilege in the world today.  I see it as a documentation of the mother daughter relationship and how it evolves while also staying the same in many ways.  I envision the daughter loving ice cream and getting excited every time her mom took her for some when she was young.  They probably have a special bond with all the times they have gotten ice cream over the years.  I imagine this is an especially strong bond considering the day I photographed them it was well below freezing outside and that they are sharing the same scoop.  In comparing the fashion and style of both I can also imagine that the mom has groomed her daughter to be a mirror image of her.  Obviously, I am presenting a fair amount of speculation and interpretation of the image but don’t we all do some amount with every image we see.  The girl being on her phone adds to the image as does the fact she apparently has seen me photographing them and my blurred reflection is visible on the granite wall.  Those last two facts bring some self-portrait elements into the image.  The Rolex store background is another important component of the image too obviously. 

New York is Mecca for Street Photographers.  I know Winogrand hated the term “Street Photography”, adamantly pointing out he was photographing people not the streets.  I also know many images I see today which are described to be “Street Photography” are not.  I think there are quite a few photographers out there that are enamored by the title of being a Street Photographer so they call any of their contrasty and saturated images street photography because it makes them hip.  I have recently seen drone photographs and ocean photographs listed as Street Photography…No

I identify as a documentary photographer, it is the most accurate description of my work because I have so many varied portfolios, documentation is the prominent element in all my work.  Stylistically when I photograph in cities, my work is Street Photography.  I am moving amongst people looking to capture split second moments of interaction which can have deeper meaning when examined as an image.  Street Photography is a process.  My movement through the people walking in the opposite direction while I try to blend into the crowd.  There is interaction in being there but usually I do not want that to influence my images.

When I am in New York photographing I look for my own images, I am not trying to mimic the work of icons.  But I do feel a unique energy from the city and knowing the legendary photographers who have also walked those streets with a camera. Some of my favorite photographers are:  Garry Winogrand, Bruce Davidson, Tod Papageorge, Helen Levitt, Joel Meyerowitz, Jill Freedman, Lee Friedlander, Danny Lyon, and Wee Gee.  I also like Bruce Gilden’s work but I could never photograph in his style too much confrontation for me but that is what sets his images apart. 

In Photographer, Street Photography Tags New York, Street Photography, Documentary Photography, Garry Winogrand, Jill Freedman, Tod Papageorge, Lee Friedlander, Photography, William Karl Valentine
Comment
P.C.622 Gallery  - The Old Pasadena Police Station at 142 North Arroyo Parkway

P.C.622 Gallery - The Old Pasadena Police Station at 142 North Arroyo Parkway

The P.C. 622 Gallery

September 27, 2021

California Penal Code Section 622 states the following: Every person, not the owner thereof, who willfully injures, disfigures, or destroys any monument, work of art, or useful or ornamental improvement within the limits of any village, town, or city, or any shade tree or ornamental plant growing therein, whether situated upon private ground or on any street, sidewalk, or public park or place, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

The first time I exhibited any of my photographs was in April 1985 at the Northlight Downstairs student gallery at Arizona State University. it was a small space near the darkrooms but it had lots of traffic and great visibility with my peer group. It also gave me my first experience editing and sequencing an exhibition. I exhibited some early images from my Pasadena Police Department series , which to this day is still my strongest body of work.

I began photographing the Officers of the Pasadena Police Department during Spring Break in 1985 as a class project while studying at Arizona State University. My father was a well-respected Reserve Police Officer, and he arranged the opportunity. I rode with Sergeant Tom Oldfield the first night who was one of my dad’s close friends. Being a Sergeant, Tom had the ability to respond to any interesting call to try and get me as much action to photograph as he could. The most eventful thing was a woman named Tina Hart who committed suicide in the middle of a street by shooting herself.  The rest of the week I rode with individual officers and photographed whatever incidents they were involved in.  When my professor, Tamarra Kaida saw my early images she realized how good the series was and encouraged me to continue photographing the department beyond the class assignment. Another professor, Bill Jenkins (best known for curating the important New Topographics exhibition) also liked the early images in this series.  Bill gave me some outstanding advice when he suggested I start using a wide-angle lens to photograph this series.  Initially I had used a 50mm lens and in some instances, I had stood back from incidents to stay out of the way.  Bill explained that using a wide-angle lens would force me to get closer to my subjects and make the images more powerful.  The combination of putting on a 35mm lens and gaining more trust from the officers I was photographing to my images to another level.  Using wide angel lenses has helped me capture most of my best images.

During the first few weeks of the summer of 1985, I started to develop good rapport with most all the officers. I knew how to stay out of the way and not let my photographing interfere with their job even though I was usually making exposures at night in low light conditions using a large off camera flash. I would make prints for the officers, and everyone liked seeing photographs of themselves working. Early in the summer of 1985, I become a Level 3 Technical Reserve Police Officer, which allowed me to volunteer in Police Department’s own photo lab most days before going on ride a longs with officers at night to photograph. It was an ideal situation because it gave me darkroom access while I was away from ASU.

One day I noticed a large empty bulletin board in the main hallway of the Police Station. The area had lots of foot traffic, department personnel as well as public visitors. I recognized the bulletin board could be a decent gallery space to showcase my photographs. I figured my photographs would be good for department morale as well as having a public relations benefit for public visitors. I asked for permission to turn the bulletin board into a gallery and it got approved. The photograph above it from the first group of prints I exhibited. I tried to change out images on a regular basis to keep interest.

I named the space the P.C. 622 Gallery to discourage any of the officers from adding comments to the prints or vandalizing them. Being around the officers I knew how much banter and teasing went on. Lockers were routinely written on highlighting recent exploits or mistakes and I knew officers started doing similar things to my photographs I would lose the space. I searched the Penal Code for sections which would cover that and discovered P.C. 622 which specifically covered destroying or defacing artwork. For the year plus the gallery was up we only had one instance where a print was written on and that was when the group of prints were not changed out for three months during a spring semester. I came across the above photograph of the gallery this week while organizing files and decide to share the story of the gallery.  I also think this post also pairs well with my post on the opening of the exhibition at the Atlanta Airport Exhibition space this week, I, like most photographers, always enjoy seeing my photographs exhibited in traditional gallery and museum spaces, But I also love showing my images and prints in non-traditional spaces that have high traffic volume.  There is always value in having images seen and experienced by others, especially in print form.

In Photography, Galleries Tags William Karl Valentine, Pasadena Police Department, Pasadena, Photography, black and white photography, Documentary Photography
Comment
Phoenix Art Museum

Phoenix Art Museum

Phoenix Art Museum - Ansel Adams - Performing the Print

April 22, 2021

At the end of March I saw a social media post from Beck Senf , the Norton Family Curator of Photography for the Phoenix Art Museum, about the Ansel Adams “Performing the Print” exhibition at the Phoenix Art Museum.  She encouraged people to see the exhibition and said it was coming to an end soon.  Because of this I got in the truck and headed East on the 10 freeway, from California, to check it out. Okay, I better give a disclaimer here, we were already heading out to see some Cactus League games but I still made a point to get over to the Phoenix Art Museum to see the exhibition after seeing her reminder.

I remember well seeing an exhibition of Ansel Adams prints at the Friends of Photography in San Francisco years ago and being so intrigued by his different printing styles over time. Seeing his prints in person is always a great reminder of what a good print should look like. I don’t recall if the Friends of Photography had as much text explanation next to the prints as they included in the Phoenix exhibition. I thought the accompanying text at the Phoenix Art Museum exhibition was outstanding.  It clearly and concisely described how the prints differed and it was written in a way that everyone could learn something from it.  From a casual museum patron to a photographer with darkroom expertise.  Unfortunately, the exhibition closed earlier this month and had been interrupted by the pandemic lockdown, but luckily I was able to see it and share the experience here.

There are better resources than me regarding the differences in Adam’s printing styles so I think it is best to just show a few photographs of the exhibition here to highlight what the exhibition was like.

View fullsize webIMG_5725.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5726 3.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5732.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5733.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5735.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5740.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5755.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5757.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5760.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5744.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5752.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5742.JPG

The Phoenix Art Museum is itself a work of art, one of the best museum spaces I have ever seen.  I would go there to see the building even if there weren’t any exhibitions up, the design and space is just that interesting.  Below are a few examples of the space. Plus, you have to love any museum that has Wayne Thiebaud’s paintings in their collection. If you live in Phoenix join the museum and if you are just visiting make sure to get over to see the Phoenix Art Museum, you will not be disappointed.

View fullsize webIMG_5687.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5691.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5764.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5741.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5692.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5695.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5697.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5700.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5698.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5711.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5710.JPG
View fullsize webIMG_5719.JPG

One other

In Museums, Galleries Tags Ansel Adams, Phoenix Art Museum, Doris and John Norton Gallery, Center for Creative Photography, Becky Senf, Arizona, Phoenix, Photography, Performing the Print, Wayne Thiebaud, Vaughn Spann, Raymon Saunders, Danielle Hacche, @phxart, #AnselAdamsPhxArt
Comment
Father Serra statue - Los Angeles, California 5/29/20

Father Serra statue - Los Angeles, California 5/29/20

Father Serra Statue - Los Angeles

July 12, 2020

I have written posts before about how Garry Winogrand is my favorite photographer. I saw his MoMA retrospective in 1988, his SFMoMA retrospective, the entire Women are Beautiful exhibition at Pier 24 and my library has lots of Winogrand books. One of my favorite books is John Szarkowski’s “Winogrand - Figments from the Real World”, and it was that book which led me to me to photograph the Father Serra statue pictured above.

father serra 1.jpg

I have gone through the book many times over the years, and early on I found something intriguing. That both Winogrand and Robert Frank had photographed the same Father Serra statue in Los Angeles in 1955. Neither of them knew one another but both stumbled on to this same statue, in the same year, while exploring America, and independent of one another. A statue that wasn’t famous and was in an unassuming part of Los Angeles. Below are their images from Szarkowski’s book.

View fullsize father serra 3.jpg
View fullsize father serra 4 GARRY WINOGRAND.jpg

Back then I decided that I also wanted to photograph the statue, maybe as a right of passage as a photographer, maybe just out of interest to see how my image would compare to their images. Using the two images I had a good idea where the statue was and I decided to photograph it on my mom’s birthday, May 29th, in 1995. I had a feeling it might become an important photograph for me so I chose a memorable date, and there was no rush since the statue wasn’t going anywhere. On the way home from Pasadena, after seeing my mom, I headed to Sunset to photograph the statue. When I got there not only was the statue not there, that part of Sunset Boulevard had been renamed and the streets were reconfigured. I got out my Thomas Brothers map (iPhones and mobile internet access did not exist yet) and began searching. After driving around for a few minutes I located the statue a couple blocks away in what is now called Father Serra Park at N. Alameda and Los Angeles Street, across from Union Station. Having a new location my background options were completely different. I decided on photographing the statue from behind, looking West, with the sun creating a good silhouette of the cross. I included a couple palm trees to frame it and the 110 Freeway on ramp sign because it said “Pasadena” & “Hollywood” on it. I actually liked my image better than theirs, and a print hangs in my house still (CA - 087 #17).

View fullsize father serra 5.jpg
View fullsize image-asset.jpeg

For whatever reason I started thinking about this image in this past May and wondered how long ago I had photographed it. I checked, it was in 1995, and I then realized 2020 was the 25th Anniversary. I decided to photograph the statue again on my mom’s birthday. On May 29th my son and I headed to Los Angeles on the way to Pasadena. We parked at Union Station, masked up, and headed over to photograph Father Serra.

View fullsize father serra 11.jpg
View fullsize father serra 12.jpg
View fullsize father serra 13.jpg
View fullsize father serra 14.jpg

The palm trees were gone and the tree behind it had grown so much it engulfed the statue. The freeway sign had been moved and there was now a fence around the statue area, I assume to keep the homeless from camping under it. I tried all the angles above and I think the image with Los Angeles City Hall in the background was the best image now.

father serra 9.jpg

As I was finishing up we heard sirens, lots of them, and saw several news helicopters South of us. We began walking towards City Hall and saw multiple LAPD patrol cars headed to City Hall and LAPD’s Headquarters, the George Floyd Protests of Los Angeles were beginning.

I photographed some in the area and found the protesters were much farther South and moving away from us. They were attempting to take over LA Live and Staples Center. Because of the distance and not knowing the situation down there we headed back to the car and went to see my mom.

View fullsize father serra 10.jpg
View fullsize father serra 16.jpg
View fullsize father serra 18.jpg
View fullsize father serra 19.jpg

As we all know the protests and civil unrest have continued, and have expanded to encompass so many more things. On June 20th , sixty indigenous activists used the current climate to stage a protest at the Father Serra statue, The activists invited the Los Angeles Times to come document the Father Serra statue being toppled and the Times accepted. The activists pulled the statue down in a ceremony, poured red paint on the head, spray painted “ACAB” (All Cops Are Bastards) on the torso, and cut the cross from his hand. They left the statue afterward but kept the cross as symbolic souvenir I assume. I have no idea how they linked the anti police narrative to Father Serra but I guess it made sense to someone with a can of spray paint.

25 Days after had I re-photographed the Father Serra statue (my 25th Anniversary of photographing it) I returned and photographed the empty pedestal.

View fullsize father serra 6.jpg
View fullsize father serra 7.jpg
View fullsize father serra 8.jpg

This man saw me photographing where the statue had been and came over to start a conversation and take his own photographs. He said as a kid he had gotten in trouble at school for talking about Father Serra’s atrocities against indigenous people instead of talking about how the missions helped to develop California. No idea if that was true but he was polite enough and I have absolutely no problem with his viewpoint. I respect his argument and I was not here in the 1700’s to see first hand what the conditions were like at the Missions.

What I do have a problem with is 60 people deciding to destroy something that belongs to an entire community of millions of Angelinos . We can not accept acts such as this to be considered an exercise of one’s “freedom of speech” if we are to maintain a Democratic society. If the activists wanted to petition for an Indigenous Statue to be placed next to the Father Serra statue to tell the full story, great!, I would support that 100%. If the public display of the likeness of a man who died 236 years ago is hurtful to the majority of the community, and the community decides to have the statue removed to a secluded place where it won’t offend people, then I am fine with that too. I am also not writing about this to defend Father Serra or the Catholic Church, nor to criticize people who exercise their First Amendment Right appropriately. But you can’t destroy history, no one rights any wrongs with toppling a monument. In this case, for me as a photographer, that statue had so much more meaning than the person it depicted because of the people who have photographed it. Its gone now, and what gain did that group get besides a brief moment in the news spotlight which has already faded, especially in today’s world of constant conflict and health worries.

SEE THESE PHOTOS ON MY 2020 WEBSITE




In Photography Tags William Karl Valentine, Father Serra, Walker Evans, Garry Winogrand, Los Angeles, Photography, Photographing Los Angeles, Statue, Protests, California, John Szarkowski
Comment
Older Posts →
Blog Index

Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/williamkarlvalentine/


Twitter

@Valentinephotog

 

Powered by Squarespace