Bill Jay memory from ASU

I was going through some old notes today before heading out to Tucson for the opening of The Qualities of Light Exhibition at The Center for Creative Photography when I came across my notes from one of Bill Jay’s History of Photography classes at ASU.

Granted my notes from back then were sloppy (my writing habits changed a year later after the police academy TAC staff taught me that life was less painful when I was able to write legibly in a consistent manner) but I think I still have down the general concept of Bill’s message that day.

He was arguing that good photographers had to understand the history of the medium and what the standards of good photography are to truly be successful. My notes quoted him as follows:

“Young Photographers do not have the knowledge of History. If you don’t know the history, when you are so self absorbed, or if not self indulgent, then there is no relevance to your work other than your own feelings”.

I think this is even a bigger issue today than back then. With the technology advancements in equipment, more people are picking up camera and claiming to be “self taught” art photographers more than ever was imaginable 30 years ago. We live in a world of the two second page view and social media “Likes”. We are inundated with images. Often drawn to the brilliance of of over saturated images created more with pre-set s in a post production computer program than the creative eye of a photographer who has hone his or her craft. I also assume many of the photographers who are popular on social media have also probably never seen a good print in person. I want to be fair< I know not everyone young photographer is like this, but unfortunately many are, and often because they don’t know any better.

Need to keep this short, I just wanted to acknowledge that so much of my development as a photographer has come from viewing and studying the prints of the masters. I don’t know any other way to understand what a beautiful print looks like without seeing examples. I try and learn something every time I see great prints, and use those experiences to remind me of the standard I am striving for. For me it is usually a “sharpening the saw” experience. So, I am excited to be continuing my education tonight in Tucson , time to start driving!

Street Photography - 2018 PDN Article

So when I was looking up articles about Jill Freedman to share in my previous post I came across a really good article on PDN.com about What Street Photography means to several notable Photographers.

In the article Joel Meyerowitz nailed it when he said “You see tons of [imagery] on the internet labeled street photography, but when I look at it, it looks mostly like portraits of people on the street, usually in the center of the frame, and a lot of that work doesn’t seem to have much invention or intelligence or spirit or spontaneity.” I could not agree more with his statement. I see way too many images today that claim to be “Street Photography” which aren’t. I have seen images that would fit closer to the style of “New Topographics” profess to be street photography. I think with some of the self taught photographers out there the term “Street Photography” is romantic, or hip, so they call all their images street photography when most aren’t. I also think its somewhat humorous because Garry Winogrand, arguably the best “Street Photographer” to date, hated the term “Street Photographer / Photography”.

Martha Cooper & Alex Webb both had great insight for the PDN article too, please refer to the link above to see their comments.

For anyone wanting to learn about Street Photography look to some of the Masters.

Garry Winogrand

Lee Friedlander

Bruce Davidson

Robert Frank

Danny Lyon

Below are some Instagram examples which support my argument that many images “Street Photography” are not. Street Photography Magazine has some images which are Street Photography but there is a mix of others which are obviously not. Street Photography International has some dynamic images, but for me I would say most images there are not “Street Photography”. The images found on the page hash-tagged Street Photography are usually a quagmire of non-Street images.

Street Photographer Magazine

Street Photography International

Street Photography



Thoughts on Robert Frank

With Robert Frank’s passing earlier this month I have read lots of tributes since and I have given some thought to how his work impacted my development as a photographer.

There is no doubt that The Americans was one of the most important things to happen to the medium, I remember Bill Jay talking about that fact when I was studying at ASU, listing it as one of the three most important things in establishing the medium in the art world. I have a copy of the book, have seen his prints, know the work well and I absolutely respect and like it. But I would never look to Frank and say he is the photographer whose work has impacted me most. I am a Winogrand fan, and I know Frank’s work impacted him, and so many others that impacted me so maybe, by proxy, Frank had a bigger impact on me than I realize.

I just read A.D. Coleman’s article on Robert Frank which has some fantastic insight. One thing that jumped out to me was the fact that Frank moved on from The Americans to film and other projects. He never did another photography series like The Americans. I think its interesting because when you look at photographers like Winogrand, Friedlander, or whomever you learn a lot by comparing their photographs over a long time period. You learn about the subject matter in greater detail (in most cases our society) and you learn about the photographer personally. It is obviously different with Frank because he leaves the documentary style of The Americans behind and moves on so there is still work that offers insight to the artist but you can not follow the change of society through his work.

For me, I experience life by photographing. Even if I don’t have a camera, visually I am constantly focusing on elements of my world and framing them in my mind. Sometimes it is actually hard not to that. I think there is a lot of value in doing long term series like most of my work. I love being able to compare things over say a 30 year span and hope that many of my series will go well beyond 50 years. It would be interesting to see Frank’s work if had continued over a long period of time, maybe it would have been too much for him. Maybe the great initial success of The Americans prevented that. Lots to consider, but I wanted to take a moment and remember an icon for his contribution to the medium.

XQD vs CFexpress Memory Cards

Amongst my arsenal of cameras I have a Nikon D850 and Nikon D500, both of which have dual card slots with one XQD and one SD card slot. I often warehouse my memory cards especially the inexpensive ones. The biggest reason is for a backup system in case I lose an external hard drive plus I foresee an advantage if I ever have to transfer old data its best to have the original source if I need it. I love that you can buy high quality SD cards which are inexpensive, plus I appreciate the fact that SD cards can be found almost anywhere. My XQD cards have performed well but they are expensive, and more times than not, hard to find. I often send my RAW files to the SD card slot, warehousing those, while using the XQD slot as my JPEG image backup. I have even gone with just an SD card when I couldn’t get a XQD card. So, when I the Nikon rep demoed the Nikon Z6 and Z7 for me, as soon as I noticed they only had XQD slots I wanted nothing to do those bodies based on that alone. At the time I knew Sony seemed to be the only one making XQD cards after Lexar went through their changes and I was wary Sony would discontinue the XQD cards because their cameras aren’t using them (apparently Delkin now has a line of XQD cards).

A couple days ago I got notice that B&H was accepting pre-orders on CFexpress Cards so I decided to educate myself more about the CFexpress card because I admit I hadn’t heard of it.

Basically the CFexpress Card is the same size as the XQD card with faster capabilities and they will replace the XQD card. I think cameras with XQD card slots will need a firmware update to be able to use the CFexpress cards but that should be simple. The great thing is SanDisk, Lexar Professional, and Pro Grade Digital (new company founded by former Lexar folks) are making the CFexpress cards so there will be competition and it looks like this card will become a standard platform for a while since it’s design allows for upgrades. Apparently this information has been coming out over the last year or two but its the first I had heard of it so I assume there are other photographers out there who also weren’t familiar with the CFexpress card so I am authoring this post.

related links you may find interesting.

https://progradedigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Camera_Compatibilty_Chart.pdf

Kishore Sawh of SLR Lounge

https://www.slrlounge.com/prograde-digital-xqd-vs-cfexpress-cfast-memory-cards/

https://www.slrlounge.com/different-u1-vs-u3-sd-memory-cards-cf-vs-xqd-cards/